Answer:
A. Tubman was a Union spy
Explanation:
It says that she worked as a spy behind Confederate lines.
Any speech that is made with the intention of inciting a violent and unlawful uprising against the administration is called a seditious speech. Such utterances may call for a rebellion against government institutions or its military, thus jeopardizing the internal security of the country.During World War I, Charles Schenck, the leader of the American Socialist Party, attempted to dissuade freshly-drafted soldiers in the US army from serving, by distributing thousands of pamphlets that claimed only the 'ruling classes' would benefit from their sacrifices. While Schenck was charged by the government in 1919, for violating the Espionage Act, which forbade interference in military recruitment, he appealed to the Supreme Court, saying that his right to free speech granted by the First Amendment, was being denied. Finally, the Court ruled in favor of the government, stating that the right to free speech was not limitless, and Schenck's actions had the potential to cause 'clear and present danger' to the administration, which Congress had the right to prevent.
Answer:
Henry II (5 March 1133 – 6 July 1189), also known as Henry Curtmantle (French: Court-manteau), Henry FitzEmpress or Henry Plantagenet, was King of England from 1154 to his death. He was the first king of the House of Plantagenet. King Louis VII of France made him Duke of Normandy in 1150.
The shift in energy consumption will naturally affect those that work in energy production. People who work on the supply chain for energy sources like coal and oil may find themselves out of a job. These people often have lower education levels than other sectors, depending on where they are on the supply chain. We are already seeing this happen in various areas of the US, such as with West Virginia's coal industry.
Less-developed nation's may be harder hit, although their already low wages may make it easier to compete in new industries. More likely, less-developed countries, which often serve as energy exporters, may see a larger hit to their GDP as energy demand shifts to renewables. Nothing is permanent though, and the true test will be which countries foresee this shift and make moves to adjust to it as early as possible.
Marbury vs. madison established this.
