My idea on cancel culture is that it can get extreme and unproductive when it gets toxic.
<h3>Cancel culture</h3>
Cancel culture is a way that people use to express their displeasure and anger over issues that they find dissatisfying.
It leads to ostracizing people or organizations due to their acts, behaviors or opinions.
Even though it can deter people and even organizations from posting offensive views, it could be negative most times.
- Cancel culture can get too far when the people are against anyone who has a different opinion from them.
- It could be regarded as toxic if it drives the other party to want to harm themselves
- If it involves invasion of privacy and threat.
It is not the best response for wrongdoing because there are other ways of tackling issues and disagreements without ostracizing the other person.
Read more on cancel culture on:
brainly.com/question/21840416?referrer=searchResults
To be honest, it's a little confusing myself, hehehe. But I believe that C might be the right answer or B. You might have to wait for other answers besides mine.
Hi!
The correct answer is actually D. Ella love wild life and was fascinated by the etymology of <em>butterfly</em>.
I have a screenshot attached as well!
Hope this helps!! :)
I wouldn't completely trust myself here, but I would choose answer C) War. And this is simply because of the language that's used, and the aggression in some of the words.
"...let slip the dogs of war;..." "..Blood and destruction shall be so in use.."
Things of that nature are pretty out there in his soliloquy, which makes me think he's in support of war. But I'm so unsure... I really do apologize :)
