Before assessing the two given cases, an assumption needs to be made about the digestion of the two types of food items, corn and beef. Let us assume that both get digested by expending same amount of energy by the human body. Let the amount of energy at producer level be an arbitrary X.
Case 1: Corn to human:
Since corn is at the producer level, it will have X amount of energy. The transfer of energy from corn to human will take place with a loss of 90% energy at the producer level. Hence the humans will receive 10% of X amount of energy.
Case 2: Corn to cow to human:
Since corn has X amount of energy, only 10% will pass to the next level, i.e. cow. So cow has 10% of X. Cow transfers only 10% of the energy that it has. Hence humans receive only 10% of 10% of X amount of energy.
It can be seen that humans receive more energy in case 1 than case 2. Hence we can say that it is more efficient for humans to feed on corn.
Might be gene regulation, the process of turning genes on and off in normal development
Answer:
<h2>Coevolution</h2>
Explanation:
Coevolution : It is the influence of closely associated species on each other in their evolution, they affect each other.
In coevolution , two or more species reciprocally affect evolution of each other by natural selection.
Coevolution Examples:
There are lots of examples of coevolution, some are here
i) coevolution of Predator-Prey , this relationship is one of the most common examples of coevolution.
ii) coevolution of Herbivores and plants,
iii) coevolution of Acacia ants and Acacias and
iii) coevolution of Flowering Plants and Pollinators and many others.
The cell grows,then separates,then prepares for mitosis
Pros:
Increase in safety.
Less traffic.
Reduced emissions.
Cons:
Eye-contact
Judgement Calls
Snow
Legal Responsibility
Cost
Lack of Trust
<u>There are many more, these are just a few.</u>
