Cite your source by using quotation marks and a link/note where you got the source. For research papers you would generally do a bibliography with MLA citations.
They respected Native territories, their ways, and treated them as the human beings they were. The Natives, in turn, treated the French as trusted friends. More intermarriages took place between French settlers and Native Americans than with any other European group.
BRAINLIEST PLSSS
Answer: He referred to the Allies as brothers-in-arm and the enemy as German war machine
Explanation: Dwight Eisenhower was the supreme commander of Allied forces in Western Europe during World War II. He led the massive invasion of Nazi-occupied Europe that began on D-Day (June 6, 1944). Just before the invasion, he wrote a call-to-arms note to rally the troops to victory.
He started by referring to the Allied forces as "Soldiers, Sailors and Airmen of the Allied Expeditionary Force", then "brave Allies and brothers-in-arms on other Fronts" as well as "free men of the world marching together in victory". On the other hand, he referred to the enemy as "German war machine" as well as "Nazi tyrants oppressing the people of Europe"
Answer:
The answer would be A
Explanation:
An example of contact metamorphism is the metamorphic rock marble. Marble is created from limestone that has been subjected to heat. Regional metamorphism by contrast takes place over large areas and is high-grade metamorphism. ... It is mostly a metamorphic rock called gneiss.
Answer:
Beliefs and proof
Explanation:
In my opinion, one of the most hardest challenges that these scientists and Archaeologists face is proof. Is it really the truth? what do i believe? Some <em><u>believe</u></em> that humans originated in Africa over 1.9 million and 135,000 years ago. Note the fact '<em><u>believe</u></em>', have scientists proved this theory of evidence? NO. Do they have human witness of how they looked liked? NO.
All around us there are only theories and beliefs but never proof or evidence.
These are some very crucial factors these scientists face, to be able to actually make people think what they think, to try and convince that even though i may not have proof, our studies and reading are 'vastly' true.
Archaeologists main passion is to understand the past, to collect data and readings, to try and interpret hidden meanings... But have we gotten a conclusion? The origin of man is a very complicated subject. As a Christian i have different beliefs, like others will to.
This brings more frustration for scientists and archaeologists to make space for their beliefs too.
I hope this helps and i hope it cleared a bit of confusion, this is just my opinion.
