What was the Supreme Court's justification for overturning the separate-but-equal doctrine?

Law

1 answer:

musickatia [10]2 years ago

5 0

Answer:

that segregated schools stigmatize minority children.

Explanation:

The seperate-but-equal doctrine was a doctrine that justified systems of segregation. The doctrine of separate-but-equal was legitimized in the 1896 Supreme Court case, Plessy v. Ferguson.

With this legal doctrine, it was allowed that public servicies, accommodation and facilities were to be seperated by race under the fact that their will should be equality. But, social services offered to African-Americans were of lower standard to that of those social services offered to white Americans.

The doctrine of separate-but-equal was overturned in 1954 by the Linda Brown v. Board of Education Supreme Court Case.

You might be interested in

You switch a track to save 5 innocent people or let them die, what would you do

Temka [501]

Answer:

I mean if i dont know those 5 people i would just let them die

Explanation:

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

1. Which is a lesser crime than murder and is committed recklessly or negligently? (1 point)

worty [1.4K]

Which is a lesser crime than murder and is committed recklessly or negligently? - the answer is arson

4 0

2 years ago

Rights of minority groups is part of the _____ party platform.

Ostrovityanka [42]

Answer:

Democratic.

Explanation:

In the US, the two main political parties are the Republican and the Democrats. The Republicans are highly connected with a conservative agenda, often focusing on economic agenda in a nationalist bias. The democrats are also patriotic, but they tend to work on human rights struggle, usually working with the right of minority and social programs.

4 0

2 years ago

Explain why a community needs a good leader

HACTEHA [7]

Explanation:

to recruit and teach others to become leaders.One of the central and long-term jobs of a community leader is to develop other leaders. Developing leaders is how you build a strong community of individuals that can work together to achieve alot.

5 0

2 years ago

Imagine Joe calls the police from his smart phone to report a crime he could see from his house. While he’s on the phone with th

Mazyrski [523]

If the police had no warrant saying they could go in or search Joe's house then the police could be in a certain amount of trouble as well seeing as Joe did not willingly let them in and they never had a warrant but Joe could be in a lot more trouble for being in the possession of drugs.

And smart homes should be more advanced to these kinds of things because they could have been fake cops, plus they had no warrant which leaves everyone in this situation at fault especially Joe for being in the possession of drugs and the possible false 911 call influenced on drugs either making him see things or think things, maybe even both.

3 0

2 years ago