State government was supposed to keep the federal government from expanding to the beast that it is now.
Answer:
The French Revolution resulted from two state crises which emerged during the 1750s–80s, one constitutional and one financial, with the latter providing a 'tipping point' in 1788/89 when desperate action by government ministers backfired and unleashed a revolution against the 'Ancien Regime.' In addition to these, there was the growth of the bourgeoisie, a social order whose new wealth, power, and opinions undermined the older feudal social system of France. The bourgeoisie were, in general, highly critical of the pre-revolutionary regime and acted to change it, although the exact role they played is still hotly debated among historians.
Maupeou, the Parlements, and Constitutional Doubts
From the 1750s, it became increasingly clear to many Frenchmen that the constitution of France, based on an absolutist style of monarchy, was no longer working. This was partly due to failures in government, be they the squabbling instability of the king's ministers or embarrassing defeats in wars, somewhat a result of new enlightenment thinking, which increasingly undermined despotic monarchs, and partly due to the bourgeoisie seeking a voice in the administration. The ideas of 'public opinion,' 'nation,' and 'citizen' emerged and grew, along with a sense that the state's authority had to be defined and legitimized in a new, broader framework which took more notice of the people instead of simply reflecting the monarch's whims. People increasingly mentioned the Estates General, a three-chambered assembly which hadn't met since the seventeenth century, as a possible solution that would allow the people—or more of them, at least—to work with the monarch. There wasn't much demand to replace the monarch, as would happen in the revolution, but a desire to bring monarch and people into a closer orbit which gave the latter more say.
that i i got my fingers hurt brainly plz
Explanation:
The evidence that a text can offer that European monarchs were pursuing policies based on assessments of political realities could be the detail that includes their actions based on their political gains.
We can note that some of the gains that these European monarchs could achieve are:
- New lands/territories
- The search for gold
- The use of slaves, etc
<h3>What is a Supporting Detail?</h3>
This refers to the use of evidence to validate a claim through the use of factual information or statistical data.
The evidence that a text can offer that European monarchs were pursuing policies based on assessments of political realities could be the detail that includes their actions based on their political gains.
Hence, we can see that your question is incomplete, so I gave you a general overview to help you get a better understanding of the concept.
Read more about supporting detail here:
brainly.com/question/884525
#SPJ1
The National Assembly's<span> declaration reflected the </span>goals<span> the revolutionaries tried to achieve. These </span>goals<span> included many Enlightenment ideas. The </span>National Assembly<span> constitution fell far short of establishing a democratic entity.</span>
Answer:
1. Reformers like Martin Luther openly challenged church practices.
3. The Bible was printed and made available to the public.
5. More than one pope was elected.
Explanation:
