3. false, it was the boston harbour
It was mostly spent on purchasing more land. This meant that they could then open new factories for industrialization and manufacturing, which meant they could get more money and trade more slaves, and then buy more land, and so it went until slavery was banned.
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "TRUE." Clark was not able to maintain his hold on the fort in Vincennes, and it was retaken by Colonel Hamilton and his troops.
<span>-domesticated animals for transportation MAYA
Mayas had a sophisticated network of transportation for their goods, that included also domesticated animals. they used this method to transport cocoa and other crops they cultivated and the proof for it is in the artefacts that still today we can find in the ancient territories where Mayas used to live, like Central America.
---
-cultivated maize on a large scale INCA
Inca cultivated maize on a large scale, as it was the base for their alimentation, as for us European was grain and for Chinese people were rice. Though cultivation was not easy in the territories of the Inca, they managed to build a system that worked for many centuries and that is still present in the remote populations that are not yet influenced by modern lifestyle.
---
-majority of people were agricultural workers MAYA
The </span>majority of people were agricultural workers in the Maya civilisations. People are needed constantly to supply the enormous demand of food of the Maya Empire, and many historians believe that one of the reasons of the Maya fall was indeed the exploitation of the natural resources due to an excessive consume.<span>
---
-prayed primarily to the sun god, Inti INCA
While practically all of the civilisation in the Central and Sud America were principally believer in a form of sun religion, the god of the sun of Inca was called Inti. The population used to pray its god through complex rituals that are a testify of the complexity of their society and their level of technological advancement.</span>
Answer:
Scientists explain the estrangement of youth from politics, as well as political absenteeism by the following factors:
The first factor - society itself is the reason for the decline in the activity of the young generation and the development of political exclusion in the youth environment. The second factor - the interests of young people are currently focused on the problems of maintaining their existence and survival in modern conditions. The third factor is that young people, on the one hand, do not see the need to radically change anything in the current way of life, and on the other, they do not consider political activity as meaningful for themselves, finding more promising ways and areas of self-affirmation and personal self-realization.
Millennials are full of reasons to push for political change. But the “youth wave" is still a myth. As a result of this, power is chosen not by young and creative people, but by the average majority living 'by yesterday and today.'
Explanation:
