Were these the choices?
A.) Joseph is confused that things happened as they did at the courthouse in chapter three.
B.) In chapter three, the reader learns that Joseph feels weird about the way events happened at the courthouse.
C.) Joseph feels some confusion about the way things occurred at the courthouse in chapter three.
D.) In chapter three, the reader learns that Joseph feels confused about the events that occurred at the courthouse.
The best revision of this sentence would be letter D - In chapter three, the reader learns that Joseph feels confused about the events that occurred at the courthouse.
Both the original and revised mean the same thing - Joseph being confused at the happenings at the courthouse.
Answer:
e local demagogue promised to generate more jobs if the people voted for him.
Missy’s friends consider her taste in clothes and accessories to be rather bourgeois.
Rachel’s enimagic behavior made her friends think she was hiding something.
The unyielding ruler Louis XVI had all the characteristics of a deposit.
Karen’s bad attitude precipitated her getting kicked off the school basketball team.
Renee coddled her new puppy and let it sleep at the foot of her bed every night.
Explanation:
Should i get the Black Or the chrome 22?
Let us dissect each sentence to tell which of these does not follow the rules for subject-verb agreement.
A.) The subject is 'each of the students' while the verb is 'is'. More particularly, the verb refers to 'each' which is singular. So, this is correct.
B.) The subject is 'student' while the verb is 'were'. The word 'were' is the paste tense of are which is used for a plural subject. But since student is singular, then the verb should have been 'was'. So, this is incorrect.
C.) The subject is 'my dog and my cat' which pertains to two nouns, thus it is plural. It agrees with its plural verb 'are'.
D.) The subject is 'Tom' while the verb is 'does'. Both are intended for singular use. So, this is correct.
Therefore, the answer to this is letter B.
Answer:
The form of appeal in the statement " <em>a prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant is unfit to be the ruler of a free people</em> " is called <u>Ethos Appeal.</u>
<em>This is because, the ruler has no moral standing to rule people due to his character which is not empathetic towards its citizens.</em>
Explanation:
Answer:
mabe they do not like them or there better then them.
Explanation:
