All categories

3 years ago

From the “Iroquois Constitution”, what role does the eagle play?

English

2 answers:

Lilit [14]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

From what we can see in this excerpt from the "Iruquois Constitution", the role played by the eagle is that of C. Guard or protector.

Explanation:

The eagle is told to be able to see afar, so it can act as a guard and alert the others of any evil approaching in the distance. Also, since it is said that the eagle only warns the people about the danger approaching but it does not attack or confront the enemies, the eagle is not a soldier or bird of pray. Option D is also incorrect because the excerpt does not tell us that the Iruquois eat the eagle.

So option C. Guard or protector is the correct answer.

Kryger [21]3 years ago

3 0

C. Guard or protector

You might be interested in

In night, Moishe the Beadle is a deeply devout student of Jewish mysticism, but after seeing what the Nazis have done “He no lon

natita [175]

Answer:

Explanation:

First of all a Beadle is a minor official in a synagogue hyrarchary. He may also be a church official in Christian Churches.

Second, you really have to know what Kabbalah is. Kabbalah is the mystic part of Jewish theology. It is not in the Bible as we understand what is supposed to be in the Bible. Anyone who studies Kabbalah is considered very devout. Few Women read Kabbalah, but like everything else, there are exceptions.

Third, not offered as a choice but I think you should know it anyway, the guards would have no idea what Moishe was saying or the incantations he repeated. But the Officers were likely educated enough that they knew what was happening.

Moishe was clever enough that he knew he was making a spectacle of himself. He knew that he had better stop drawing attention attention to himself.

So he, like all the other Jews, only spoke of things that was around him. I could have started just by giving you the answer, but this question is far to important just to do that.

How dare the person giving the question offer you C. It is an outrage. We are talking about survival, not learning during peaceful times. Not C

Moishe might have begun thinking about A. He changed. I don't think A is the answer.

B is true, but not from this passage.

So D is the only answer (poor as it is).

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

PLS HELP I REALLY NEED HELP PLEASEEE

Butoxors [25]

2) To pull in the opposite direction.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which information from the article answers the question ."How did the tsunamis occur

madam [21]

The most powerful earthquake recorded in Japanese history, magnitude 8.9. The tremors were the result of a violent uplift of the sea floor 80 miles off the coast of Sendai, where the Pacific tectonic plate slides beneath the plate Japan sits on. Tens of miles of crust ruptured along the trench where the tectonic plates meet. The earthquake occurred at the relatively shallow depth of 15 miles, meaning much of its energy was released at the seafloor.

7 0

3 years ago

How does Poe use the first line of the story to build suspense?

Paladinen [302]

Answer:

Poe uses the first line of the story to build suspense in the following manner:

C. Poe informs the reader that Fortunato has wronged the narrator but doesn't say specifically what Fortunato did which creates a sense of uncertainty.

Explanation:

This question is about the short story "The Cask of Amontillado," by author Edgar Allan Poe. Take a look at how the story begins:

THE thousand injuries of Fortunato I had borne as I best could, but when he ventured upon insult I vowed revenge. You, who so well know the nature of my soul, will not suppose, however, that gave utterance to a threat. At length I would be avenged; this was a point definitely, settled --but the very definitiveness with which it was resolved precluded the idea of risk. I must not only punish but punish with impunity. A wrong is unredressed when retribution overtakes its redresser. It is equally unredressed when the avenger fails to make himself felt as such to him who has done the wrong.

We get to know two things from the get-go: the narrator feels that Fortunato has offended him; and the narrator is adamant about avenging himself.

However, at no point does the narrator reveal what Fortunato has done. Apparently, Fortunato has injured him before. Now, it is an offense. But how can we trust this narrator if he does not reveal what happened? Maybe he is too sensitive and took things too personally. Maybe nothing happened at all- he might be insane, for all we know. We are left with this uncertainty, even though the narrator tells us we know him well. We do not. He does not offer us enough information to judge for ourselves.

7 0

2 years ago

Which of the following is an example of third person objective point of view?

Aleksandr [31]

Answer: Destiny chose to take art instead of music because she enjoyed art more.

I love running outside in the rain. This is an example of a first-person point of view (using pronoun “I”). The narrator is talking about what he himself likes.

Destiny chose to take art instead of music because she enjoyed art more. This is an example of third-person objective point of view. The third-person is demonstrated by the use of “he/she,” while the objectivity is shown because the narrator does not know any more information than what could be guessed by everyone in the story.

Jake hastily made the decision to leave his umbrella by the door instead of taking it with him. This would prove a poor choice. This is an example of a third-person subjective point of view. The character is a narrator who is not only describing the events, but has information that no character would know. The narrator could know about the character’s feelings, future plans, concerns, even when the character hasn’t mentioned them out loud. In this case, the narrator has information about the future consequences of not taking the umbrella.

You should always listen to your mother's advice. This is a second-person point of view (using pronoun “you”).

4 0

3 years ago