To compare the points of view of Grandpa and Dad about the past first read the information about them, list the points of view of each person, and finally identify common points and differences through keywords.
<h3>What is to compare?</h3>
A comparison implies identifying both the common points (similarities) and contrasting points (differences) of two or more elements.
<h3>What are the steps to compare Grandpa and Dad's perspectives?</h3>
Even though there is not enough information about who they are or their ideas about the past; here are some basic steps you can follow:
- Carefully read the information about them: The first step is to read and analyze the information of the source about Grandpa and Dad.
- Identify the point of view of each person: After reading the information about them, you need to identify what each person thinks about the past.
- Find similarities and contrasting ideas: Finally, you can compare and contrast the points to view to find out how similar or different they are.
Note: This question is incomplete because there is no information about the perspectives of the people mentioned; due to this, I answered it based on general knowledge.
Learn more about comparison in: brainly.com/question/1516829
Answer:
how about the Indians Thanksgiving is right around the corner
Credible would be
Someone who's credible is honest and believable. ... Similar to words like reliable and plausible, credible is an adjective that comes to us from the Latin credibilis, meaning “worthy to be believed.” A credible reputation is often earned through consistent good behavior and an overall trustworthy personality.
Answer:
To study the processes by which past behaviour influences future behaviour, participants were led to believe that without being aware of it, they had expressed either support for or opposition to the institution of comprehensive exams. Judgment and response time data suggested that participants’ perceptions of their past behaviour often influenced their decisions to repeat the behaviour. This influence was partly the result of cognitive activity that influenced participants’ cognitions about specific behavioural consequences and the attitude they based on these cognitions. More generally, however, feedback about past behaviour had a direct effect on participants’ attitudes and ultimate behavioural decisions that were independent of the outcome-specific cognitions. Results are discussed in terms of their implications for biased scanning of memory, dissonance reduction, self-perception, and the use of behaviour as a heuristic.
Answer:
the correct answer is early, tomorrow
<em>Hope this answer correct </em><em>:</em><em>)</em>
