Answer:
The son is 4years old
Step-by-step explanation:
Let the son's age=x
the father's age=8x
IN 10YEARS,
Son's age=x+10
father's age=8x+10
Equate them
8x+10=3(x+10)
8x+10=3x+30
5x=20
x=4
I will convert feet to inches.
4 feet, 6 inches = 54 inches
20 feet = 240 inches
5/x = 54/240
Let x = closest height of tree
54x = 5(240)
54x = 1,200
x = 1200/54
x = 22.2222222222
The tree is about 22 feet tall.
Answer:
a
The null hypothesis is
The alternative hypothesis is
b

c
The decision rule is
Reject the null hypothesis
d
The conclusion is
There is no sufficient evidence to conclude that the variance of the immune response is equal to 1.9.
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are are told that
The variance is
The sample size is n = 30
The sample variance is
The level of significance is
The null hypothesis is
The alternative hypothesis is
Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

=> 
=> 
Generally from the degree of freedom is mathematically represented as

=> 
=> 
Generally from the chi distribution table the critical value of
at a degree of freedom of
is

=> 
Gnerally from the values obtained we see that
hence
The decision rule is
Reject the null hypothesis
The conclusion is
There is no sufficient evidence to conclude that the variance of the immune response is equal to 1.9.
2,568-485= 2083
2083/150= 13.87 weeks (about 14 weeks)
Not sure if it's right