They would step harder because their body uses more force on each step.
I don't think dropping the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was either necessary or acceptable. Japan was already weakened by the war and it was obvious that it wouldn't be able to fight much more. That's why America had other options to choose from in order to end the war other than the atomic bomb. However, I don't think their dropping the atomic bomb had much to do with Japan - it was just a demonstration of the US power and a threat to other countries in the world not to mess with it - Japan just happened to be the guinea pig. The atomic bomb led to the deaths of more than 200,000 people in Japan, and to dire consequences in Hiroshima and Nagasaki which can be still felt today, over 70 years since the bombing happened.
In the early 20th cent., the court appeared to be highly conservative in its views. It showed in general a rigid adherence to stare decisis
(the rule that precedents are to be followed), a tendency to prevent
the states from adopting laws that restricted business in its employment
practices and other activities, and little disposition to restrain the
states from restricting civil liberties, as in the Plessy v. Ferguson
case (1896), which upheld the right of states to enforce
segregationist Jim Crow legislation in many Southern states. In the
Insular Cases (1901), arising out of questions concerning the status of
peoples in the territories acquired as a result of the Spanish American
War, the court asserted that the civil rights guaranteed by the
Constitution did not automatically apply to the people of an annexed
territory, i.e., the Constitution did not follow the flag.
hope it helps
Answer:
he opposed the ratification of the US Constitution
Get some of the things they had lost back
