1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Delvig [45]
3 years ago
12

.Think of ways in which the values of one group of people clash with the values of another group. List at least five examples.

Social Studies
1 answer:
seropon [69]3 years ago
5 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Think of ways in which the values of one group of people clash with the values of another group. List at least five examples.

1.- People who are so attached to traditional religions such as Jewish, Christians, and Catholics that clash with some other liberal groups on the issue of abortion.

2.- People that are radical extremists and supremacists that show racial behaviors and aggressions that clash with people that support diversity in society and welcome blacks, whites, Latinos, Asians, and more nationalities.

3.- People that have an ingrained nationalistic attitude and oppose to globalization that clash with modern thinking people that support globalization, free trade agreements, and international collaboration.

4.- People that still think that no guns and weapon regulations are necessary because it's against their rights that clash with conscious people that worry that lack of guns' regulation can still be the cause of so many shootings in public places.

5.- People that do not think that disclosure is important because they want to continue to live in the conservative lives that clash with people that demand disclosure to know everything that has been covered by the federal government and other interest groups.

You might be interested in
Was Hilter justified in wanting to violate the Treaty of Versailles
seropon [69]

Answer: yes

Explanation: He was a soilder to fight in a war that his country was dragged into and his country was blamed for the war so he wanted to get everything that was taken starting with the land.

8 0
3 years ago
SOCIAL STUDIES HELP ASAP PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Zanzabum
Answer to question 16)

-Women nurses risked their lives for soldiers but could not vote. So their great involvement and help in the war helped them get the vote

-women had helped out a lot in the war when men were conscripted when men over a certain age were forced to go to fight for his the women had to take on the jobs of men in the United States and this proved that women were just as capable as men at accomplishing things. Because of the vital work completed by the women during the war and politicians became sympathetic to their cause and allowed them to vote.

Answer to question 17)

-They believed that their people,their country was stronger,better,and had greater willpower than other
countries,and that therefore they would inevitably triumph in any conflict with them.

Hope this helps (:
5 0
3 years ago
The straw man fallacy occurs when the arguer presents an extreme version of the opposing position in order to make it easier to
kirill115 [55]

Answer:

answer is given below

Explanation:

  • They are attacking immigrants from a personal point of view.
  • Stewart and Hodgman use the straw man fallacy to make their case more solid. They explain that immigrants are dangerous people who bring violence and sickness, then they change positions and show how innocent the hosts are and are not eligible for the programs that immigrants bring.
  • Yes, they use common beliefs. If the leprosy epidemic erupts, it will most likely endanger Americans' fingers. Or comments that shock Americans on leprosy in America. But we have to remember that this show is a comedy. The chart shown is certainly not for any decision. The facts are not correct for cases of leprosy.
  • Stewart and Hodgman rightly criticize the general and the hypocritical and hypocritical about immigration. This problem is exaggerated because it is founded on American immigrants and the general belief that the majority of politicians like Newt Gingrich are immigrants.
  • STEwarT and Hodgman are using the Straw Man fallacy to make their case even more convincing. Or, for example, they are considered dangerous people who bring immigrant violence, diseases and all kinds of social diseases; Then they change the positons and show how innocent the hosts are and are not entitled to any property brought by the immigrants.
3 0
3 years ago
Liza is asked whether a person should steal food if they are starving. Liza says no, the person should ask for help and someone
chubhunter [2.5K]

Answer:

Kohlberg

Explanation:

Liza is asked whether a person should steal food if they are starving. Liza says no, the person should ask for help and someone would offer food. Liza's answer is BEST explained by kohlberg.

Lawrence Kohlberg is a psychologist best known for his theory of stages of moral development, he expanded on the earlier work of Jean Piaget( cognitive theorist) to explain the moral development of children in which he believe follows series of stage. He defines these stage as pre-conventional, conventional and post-conventional, each of these levels are divided into two stages for a total of six stage.Lawrence Kohlberg moral development plays an important part in the socialization process, it helps us to learn the way people in a society are considered to be good or bad which is important for functioning society.

Liza says no because she believe in moral of not stealing, so the person should ask for help  when they are starving and someone would offer food.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When developmentalists use the term "expert," they usually mean a person who _____. question 20 options:
kvv77 [185]
I believe the answer is: <span>is significantly better than others at performing a certain task

Developmentalist believe that a strong skill set is aquired through repeating a certain action over and over again to the point where that person could perform a certain task in significantly better quality compared to other people.
According to these developmentalists, in order to be a world class expert in a certain thing, you need to at least put 10,000 hours of effort into that task.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • While watching a basketball game on television, Ryan typically leaves the room during commercial breaks and returns only when th
    12·1 answer
  • Give examples of roman ideas in language and architecture that exist today
    8·1 answer
  • 3 ways the pandemic could affect a household economy
    15·1 answer
  • How has increased immigration from latin america affected schools along the u.s. border with mexico? what is the best thesis sta
    6·1 answer
  • As Renaissance gardens evolved toward the Baroque, they became Group of answer choices
    11·1 answer
  • You're over 18 years old, have been in the country for six years, and have learned english. What's your next step toward becomin
    6·1 answer
  • Who was the main consumer madame cj walker consumers of her products?????? ​
    15·1 answer
  • What was the 2nd bloodiest battle of revolutionary war?
    13·1 answer
  • Write the fullform of mdg.How do you define it?​
    11·1 answer
  • What was a main goal of the Panama Canal?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!