Explain how they have had an impact on changing perspectives
Answer:
Frame Work
Explanation:
The United States Constitution wasn't a bunch of laws but a declaration of rights for the people, "
A constitution is an aggregate of fundamental principles or established precedents that constitute the legal basis of a polity, organization or other type of entity, and commonly determine how that entity is to be governed."
1. The Massachussett congressman believes that the Indians have all the right to stay on their own lands, and that the settlers have little to no rights of taking the land from the Native Americans. He also states that there were plentiful land in which they already have to accomadate all the people, and they should allow the Native Americans to continue living in their own lands, & the citizens should be thankful for what they already have.
2. To keep the US from passing the expansion, because he finds that there is no need for it at all.
3.The US was deciding on whether they should expand westward or not (this would lead to the Lewis & Clark Expedition)
hope this helps
Answer:
The statement that is not true is: B. Article III gives the judicial branch power to enforce laws.
Explanation:
Article Three of the United States Constitution is about the judicial branch of the federal government, but it does not give it the power to enforce laws. The power to enforce laws isn't part of the judicial branch but of the executive.
After the arrival in the western hemisphere, paleo-indians migrated to the southern tip of south america and virtually everywhere in the western hemisphere.
