Answer:
10 Workers would cause the marginal cost to exceed the marginal benefit.
Explanation:The marginal cost is the total cost of a final product. Including every dollar spent. Taking a Lynch perspective here, the cost would consider equipment, corporation properties, and every other expense. So, at the end of all the sum of investment, we will obtain a number of costs related to each unit produced. The bigger the amount, the smaller the cost price. Therefore, it is very important. The Marginal benefit is the advantage a customer has over the price of a certain product in case of requiring to buy two of the same. In other words, is the price the customer is willing to pay for a second unit of the same product. In our case, the combination of both gets us 10 workers because at that price we would require 10 workers o exceed the price the customer is willing to pay for a second unit of the same product.
This technique is called natural bead weaving. If you want to create a bracelet, necklaces, earrings, or wall-hangings the only things you need is a thread and needle. The rest of options contain either techniques that require only a thread or the techniques that are actually a style of natural bead weaving.
Gangs, Pasta and Drugs of course
The correct answer is D. enforce new laws in the South. The problem was that there were still a lot of racially discriminatory laws in the south and a lot of social discrimination which made it difficult to enforce new laws,such as the prohibiton of racial discrimination of voting.
Although the tenant/sharecropping system is usually thought of as a development that occurred after the Civil War, this type of farming existed in antebellum Mississippi, especially in the areas of the state with few slaves or plantations, such as northeast Mississippi.
Not all whites who emigrated to even the poorest parts of Mississippi in the years before the Civil War had the funds to purchase a farm. As a result, most of the men who headed these households worked as tenant farmers or sharecroppers. Many rented land from or farmed on shares with family members and typically received favorable arrangements, but some antebellum tenants or sharecroppers had to deal with landlords who were primarily concerned with making profits rather than helping struggling farmers move toward landownership.
Consider the sharecropping arrangement that Richard Bridges of Marshall County worked out with his landlord, T. L. Treadwell, in the 1850s. Treadwell provided Bridges with land, livestock, and tools; the landlord also advanced Bridges some food. Bridges grew corn and cotton, and at the end of the year, he had to give Treadwell one-sixth of the corn he grew and five-sixths of the cotton raised. From his share of the crop, Bridges also had to pay Treadwell for the use of the livestock and tools and for the food advanced. Obviously, Bridges worked the entire year primarily for the food he needed to live. He had no opportunity to make any money from this arrangement and accumulate the capital that would allow him to purchase his own farm.
