I say false . Because a high social status automatically leads to a position of power . Social status is the postition or rank of a person or group
B. By narrowing the topic, you're narrowing the possible information and giving more in-depth answers at the same time. It's a win-win.
The question wants to analyze your ability to argue and counter-argument. For that reason, I'm not going to answer this question for you, but I'll show you how to answer it.
A counterclaim is a counter-argument, that is, it is a way of countering a previously stated argument.
The counterclaim has the same structure as the argument, which is to present a statement and evidence that confirms it, the difference is that this statement must present a concept contrary to the argument mentioned.
Therefore, to write the counterclaim you must question the statement about building a subdivision on a swamp reserve, showing how this is neither positive nor beneficial.
<h3>Matters you can address in your counterclaim</h3>
- Environmental destruction.
- Problems with fauna and flora.
- Lack of security in the lot.
- High cost of establishing the allotment.
More information about counter-arguments in the link:
brainly.com/question/13617997
My choice would be A. It’s not B since “the conflict are” is incorrect. Not C since “they writes” is incorrect. And I believe D is incorrect since “a Nobel Prize winner” doesn’t agree with “are” — you could rewrite it as “The Nobel prize winner IS either Lessing or Gordimer”.
