It can be inferred that the narrator means that they had no other option but to make to for obey their "harsh mistress".
<h3>Who is a narrator?</h3>
A narrator is a person via whose perspective a story is being told. Types of narrators are:
- First-Person Narrative
- Second-Person Narrative
- Third-Person Narrative
- Omniscient Third-Person Narrator.
From the above text, it can be concluded or inferred that the narrator and others with him were in a place that was difficult as far as the mistress was concerned but had not option but to endure it.
Learn more about narrator:
brainly.com/question/14305951
#SPJ1
Answer:
Brutus joins the men in the conspiracy to kill Caesar but discourages them from killing Antony as well.
Explanation: Hi my name is Ace. I took the test and I made a 80% on it and I got that question right so I'm glad I could help if anything comes up please let me know!!!
<h2><u>Answer:</u></h2>
Transient measurable examination empowers you to analyze and demonstrate the conduct of a variable in an informational collection after some time (e.g., to decide if and how focuses are changing over the long haul.
Worldly explanatory strategies to follow nanoparticles in live cell would give rich data to surely know the biologic properties of nanoparticles in atomic dimension. Noteworthy advances in fluorescence microscopy procedures with high transient and spatial goals permit single nanoparticles to mark biomolecules, particles, and microstructures in live cells, which will address numerous principal inquiries in cell science.
Methods for observing the development of nanomaterials, for example, carbon nanotubes (CNTs), quantum spots (QDs), metal groups, upconver-sional nanomaterials, and polystyrene (PS) nanoparticles and so on in live cells. The organic properties of nanoparticles in live cells are likewise quickly abridged by fluorescence microscopy examines.
Answer:
The correct answer is oxymoron.
Explanation:
Oxymoron is a type of figurative language used when trying to illustrate a rhetoric point.
Here, it is obvious that Queen Elizabeth had a purpose for saying this quote.
What she <u><em>did not</em></u> do was compare two objects (simile or metaphor), give inanimate objects human qualities (personification), use words of noises (onomatopoeia), or use words that start with the same letters (alliteration.)
Therefore, t he correct answer is oxymoron.
Hope this helps! :D