1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Liula [17]
3 years ago
12

Which type of essay does not require that you examine and analyze secondary source documents? A. DBQ essay B. free response essa

y C. globally thinking essay D. process essay E. thematic essay
History
1 answer:
makvit [3.9K]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: B. free response essay

Explanation: A free response is for the test taker to state a belief, opinion, or short answer.  Because it is free response you are supposed to state your belief about the subject and that is why you arent looking into addition sources

You might be interested in
How did businesspeople form corporations
enyata [817]
They combine their capital and receive permission from the government to merge
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What accounted to the late development of media in west Africa​
galben [10]

Answer:The Development of Media Freedom in West Africa . ... years later when Senegal would launch its first newspaper2. The first major spike in the media freedom ...

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
How are prices determined in capitalists economic?
stira [4]
In a capitalist society the prices of goods, services and labour are determined by supply and demand. If a lot of people want to buy a certain product its price will go up. Products that are mass produced usually have low prices. Another important feature of capitalism is competition.
6 0
3 years ago
What endeared the public to Will Rogers?
statuscvo [17]
The correct answer would be c
5 0
3 years ago
1. How does the author characterize the
nexus9112 [7]

Answer:s the United States enters the 21st century, it stands unchallenged as the world’s economic leader, a remarkable turnaround from the 1980s when many Americans had doubts about U.S. “competitiveness.” Productivity growth—the engine of improvement in average living standards—has rebounded from a 25-year slump of a little more than 1 percent a year to roughly 2.5 percent since 1995, a gain few had predicted.

Economic engagement with the rest of the world has played a key part in the U.S. economic revival. Our relatively open borders, which permit most foreign goods to come in with a zero or low tariff, have helped keep inflation in check, allowing the Federal Reserve to let the good times roll without hiking up interest rates as quickly as it might otherwise have done. Indeed, the influx of funds from abroad during the Asian financial crisis kept interest rates low and thereby encouraged a continued boom in investment and consumption, which more than offset any decline in American exports to Asia. Even so, during the 1990s, exports accounted for almost a quarter of the growth of output (though just 12 percent of U.S. gross domestic product at the end of the decade).

Yet as the new century dawns, America’s increasing economic interdependence with the rest of the world, known loosely as “globalization,” has come under attack. Much of the criticism is aimed at two international institutions that the United States helped create and lead: the International Monetary Fund, launched after World War II to provide emergency loans to countries with temporary balance-of-payments problems, and the World Trade Organization, created in 1995 during the last round of world trade negotiations, primarily to help settle trade disputes among countries.

The attacks on both institutions are varied and often inconsistent. But they clearly have taken their toll. For all practical purposes, the IMF is not likely to have its resources augmented any time soon by Congress (and thus by other national governments). Meanwhile, the failure of the WTO meetings in Seattle last December to produce even a roadmap for future trade negotiations—coupled with the protests that soiled the proceedings—has thrown a wrench into plans to reduce remaining barriers to world trade and investment.

For better or worse, it is now up to the United States, as it has been since World War II, to help shape the future of both organizations and arguably the course of the global economy. A broad consensus appears to exist here and elsewhere that governments should strive to improve the stability of the world economy and to advance living standards. But the consensus breaks down over how to do so. As the United States prepares to pick a new president and a new Congress, citizens and policymakers should be asking how best to promote stability and growth in the years ahead.

Unilateralism

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why is Alexander called “Great”? *
    13·1 answer
  • Which progressive reform was enacted by constitution amendment?
    13·2 answers
  • (K12) Enter the codeword you receive when you completed the Postwar America unit review activity.
    6·1 answer
  • What formed a provisional government ​
    11·1 answer
  • Compare and contrast the people and economies of the South and Northeast regions of the United States. In a short paragraph, ide
    6·2 answers
  • Match these men with their descriptions. 1. President of the Confederacy Jefferson Davis 2. killed by one of his own men P.G.T.
    8·1 answer
  • What were the key aspects of Lyndon B. Johnson’s Great Society?
    9·1 answer
  • Ever since 1845, general elections for the president and the members of the House of Representatives have been held on which dat
    6·1 answer
  • Please please help me
    6·1 answer
  • Which was more effective slavery or pro slavery?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!