Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be "Argument Ad Populum".
Explanation:
- An argumentum ad populum seems to be a specious argument which argues that perhaps a concept would have to be valid because it will be believed by so many or by several people, sometimes accurately embedded as: "If many think so, it's so".
- The typical implicit fallacy of argumentum ad populum is generally defined as the mistake perpetrated by aiming an emotional argument to either the "gallery" or "citizens" emotions or enthusiasm to gain approval to such an argument not properly backed by adequate evidence.
Therefore, it's the right answer.
Answer:B
Explanation:
I know that indonesit has big deforestation problems. Sorry If Im wrong but I’m certain it is B
D. They are both mixed economies.
Answer:
1. In<u>ductive argument</u>.
2. <u>Inductive argument.</u>
3. <u>Deductve argument.</u>
Explanation:
1. This argument is inductive. The conclusion is a generalization, that is drawn by a premise, the premise has been obtained out of experimentation.
If two grains of sand have diamons, it doesn´t mean the entire beach is made of them. This argument is not strong because the conclusion is not accurate.
2. This is a deductive argument. This type of argument depends on the logic struture of it. If the premise were to be true, the conclusion would be true also.
It is not a sound argument, because thanksgiving happends every fourth thursday of november. It is an invalid argument because the premise is false, there for the concusion is false.
3. This is an invalid deductive argument. The premise is incorrect, so the conclusion that is being deduce from it is also wrong. It is not a sound argument because if you double the length of the sides of a square, the area would quatriple.
