Answer:
angle 11 they are vertically opposite.
For this case we have that the cost of candies is given by:

If we have to:
c: Represents the cost of candy
p: Represents the number of pounds of candy
So, we can raise the following equation:

Answer:
The equation is:
Option C
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
From the given information:
The null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis can be computed as:
(i.e. there is no difference between the SAT score for students in both locations)
(i.e. there is a difference between the SAT score for students in both locations)
The test statistics using the students' t-test for the two-samples; we have:






t = 2.06
degree of freedom = (
) -2
degree of freedom = (45+38) -2
degree of freedom = 81
Using the level of significance of 0.05
Since the test is two-tailed at the degree of freedom 81 and t = 2.06
The p-value = 0.0426
Decision rule: To reject
if the p-value is less than the significance level
Conclusion: We reject the
, thus, there is no sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant difference between the SAT math score for students in Pennsylvania and Ohio.
Answer: I think its A
Step-by-step explanation: maybe
Answer:
x=15/p p=-5 then x=(-3)
Step-by-step explanation:
4px+4=64
4px=60
px=15