Answer:
Social influence theory
Explanation:
Kelman's social influence theory suggests that the attitude, behavior and personal belief of a person are based on the concepts of compliance, identification, and internalization. Th resultant actions are therefore a shadow of these processes and concepts. Here, it is suggested that hypnosis involves inducing someone to enact the role of a hypnotic subject which involves the idea of social compliance and then social identification and internalization that they are being hypnotized. Hence, the theory says that hypnosis is a result of external social factors.
<span>Hurston feels that she has nothing to lose by persevering due to slavery. She is proud of it. She is criticized for having a different view on slavery, because she is embracing it and trying to create something positive for herself. People might think she is selfish and short-sighted.</span>
The correct answer is Rights View of Ethics.
<u>Rights-based ethics</u> is a concept whereby all humans have rights based only on the fact that they are human. These rights are natural rights (moral ones) and conventional rights as created by the society in which that person lives in (different values). The opposite of rights based ethics are<u> utilitarian ethics</u>, which are based on the maximization of "good outcomes" and minimizations of "bad outcomes." An example of a rights-based ethics is: The right to freely practice a religion of choice; an example of an utilitarian ethics is: that it would be acceptable to torture someone to gain information to save others as it would have a positive net outcome.
Answer:
b) the country's occupation by great britain
Answer:
The French Revolution had very little impact on American foreign policy
Explanation:
Despite the increasing radicalization of the French Revolution, the United States remained neutral while monarchal nations like Great Britain and Spain were in a war against Revolutionary France. The Republicans could see France as a potential ally against Great Britain, but both federalists and republicans considered that war would affect the economy and lead to an invasion.