1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
antiseptic1488 [7]
3 years ago
9

What is the Federal Government decision that determined slaves to not be considered citizens and therefore do not have the right

s afforded to citizens under the constitution.
History
2 answers:
kirill [66]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The Federal Government decision that determined slaves to not be considered citizens and therefore do not have the rights afforded to citizens under the constitution was the Supreme Court's ruling in Dred Scott v. Sanford.

Explanation:

Dred Scott was a slave belonging to the military surgeon John Sanford of Missouri. Scott wandered with his master and lived with him for some time in Illinois (free from slavery) and in Minnesota (slavery was abolished there in accordance with the Missouri Compromise). In 1846 both of them returned to their native state and Scott decided to submit an application to the court for recognition as a free man. He justified his petition by the fact that he was in free territory for a long time. Judicial practice was based on the assumption that the slave labor system could not be restored in any of the territories where it was outlawed.

For these reasons, Scott's longer detention in free states could have been the basis for changing his slave status. The first verdict in this case was issued by the Missouri state court in 1852, where Judge William Scott stated that the political situation had changed, so court rulings should also change in this matter. Wanting to change the behavior of local courts, Scott appealed to the Supreme Court, although he was aware of its pro-slavery composition.

The case was presented to the highest authority of the judiciary in 1856. President of the Court, Roger Taney, then formulated two legal problems. First, he questioned whether Dred Scott, being an African American, had the right to lodge a complaint. Secondly, he questioned which regulations should settle the question: state law or the Missouri Compromise. In the first doubt, Taney ruled that Scott could not apply to the Supreme Court because he was not a citizen. On the second issue, Taney considered that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional. He stated that Congress had no right to prohibit bringing slaves to any area without first instituting legal proceedings. The Supreme Court accepted Taney's motions and approved the sentence, by 7 votes to 2.

crimeas [40]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Dred Scott vs Sanford

Explanation:

You're welcome

You might be interested in
What is the best description of the Compromise of 1850?
konstantin123 [22]

Answer:

The arrangement was made with Mexico agreeing to end the U.S.-Mexican war.

Explanation:

It admitted California as a free state, left Utah and New Mexico to decide for themselves whether to be a slave state or a free state, defined a new Texas-New Mexico boundary, and made it easier for slaveowners to recover runways under the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850.

6 0
3 years ago
About how many Americans served in the armed forces during World War Il?
LuckyWell [14K]

Answer:

Over 16.5 million men and women

Explanation:

Over 16.5 million men and women served in the armed forces during World War II, of whom 291,557 died in battle, 113,842 died from other causes, and 670,846 were wounded.

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
To all those people being bullied
andrey2020 [161]

Answer:

thank you... I needed this- but I may not stop c//tting... im sorry... but I won't today. I'll try.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
What role did the military play in many Latin American countries during the 1920s and 1930s? Use specific examples to support yo
konstantin123 [22]
Assuming you mean the military of the USA, in the 1920s the US military engaged in a series of military interventions called Banana Wars in order to keep the economic climate in the area friendly to American commercial interest. They were called Banana Wars because the main interest was from fruit companies. In the 1930s FDR's Good Neighbor Policy toned down American involvement in the area.
6 0
4 years ago
Which leader survived World War II?
Effectus [21]
(C.) Winston Churchill
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why does the United States use sanctions as a tool of foreign policy? A. Making a treaty with another country can have mutual be
    9·1 answer
  • What does the table reveal about U.S. dependence on foreign oil since 1990?
    13·1 answer
  • Can someone please help me with my U.S History work?!
    5·1 answer
  • That’s the answer if someone need it :)
    10·2 answers
  • What people or tribes bordered The xiongnu to the north and the south?
    5·2 answers
  • The fort labeled with the number 1 on the map above is
    14·2 answers
  • Where were the U.S. aircraft carriers during the attack on Pearl Harbor? How many were destroyed during the attack?
    5·1 answer
  • 1. Why would the U.S. still allow teachers, students,
    7·1 answer
  • What does wach branch of goverment do
    7·1 answer
  • All of the following is true about the Constitution of 1876 EXCEPT:
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!