1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Aloiza [94]
3 years ago
14

Leslie wants to teach her cousins not to be racists. What should she do?

History
1 answer:
LuckyWell [14K]3 years ago
6 0
The correct answer is definetly d
You might be interested in
How does wallaces description of American foreign policy compare to trumans and nivikovs
umka2103 [35]

Wallace had been one of the few people who had gone against the Cold War policies. He believes that the War will only make things worse for the economy of their country. He had described it as “death and taxes as profits for the many”


6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following best describes the Middle Passage?
Slav-nsk [51]
"<span>a. It was the middle leg of a three-legged journey, a leg in which slaves were transported from Africa to the Americas" would best describe the "Middle Passage" which was extremely brutal. Many slaves died en route. </span>
7 0
3 years ago
What impact did the oil industry have on transportation in the United States
Andreyy89

Answer:

North America is experiencing a boom in crude oil supply, primarily due to growing production in the Canadian oil sands and the recent expansion of shale oil production from the Bakken fields in North Dakota and Montana as well as the Eagle Ford and Permian Basins in Texas. Taken together, these new supplies are fundamentally changing the U.S. oil supply-demand balance. The United States now meets 66% of its crude oil demand from production in North America, displacing imports from overseas and positioning the United States to have excess oil and refined products supplies in some regions.

The rapid expansion of North American oil production has led to significant challenges in transporting crudes efficiently and safely to domestic markets—principally refineries—using the nation’s legacy pipeline infrastructure. In the face of continued uncertainty about the prospects for additional pipeline capacity, and as a quicker, more flexible alternative to new pipeline projects, North American crude oil producers are increasingly turning to rail as a means of transporting crude supplies to U.S. markets. Railroads are more willing to enter into shorter-term contracts with shippers than pipelines, offering more flexibility in a volatile oil market. According to rail industry officials, U.S. freight railroads delivered 435,560 carloads of crude oil in 2013 (roughly equivalent to 300 million barrels), compared to 9,500 carloads in 2008. In the first half of 2014, 258,541 carloads of crude oil were delivered. Crude imports by rail from Canada have increased more than 20-fold since 2011. The amount of oil transported by rail may also be influenced by a tight market for U.S.-built tankers. However, if recent oil price declines persist and the price falls below the level at which Bakken producers can cover their costs, some production could be shut in, potentially reducing the volume of oil carried by rail.

While oil by rail has demonstrated benefits with respect to the efficient movement of oil from producing regions to market hubs, it has also raised significant concerns about transportation safety and potential impacts to the environment. The most recent data available indicate that railroads consistently spill less crude oil per ton-mile transported than other modes of land transportation. Nonetheless, safety and environmental concerns have been underscored by a series of major accidents across North America involving crude oil transportation by rail—including a catastrophic fire that caused numerous fatalities and destroyed much of Lac Mégantic, Quebec, in 2013. Following that event, the U.S. Department of Transportation issued a safety alert warning that the type of crude oil being transported from the Bakken region may be more flammable than traditional heavy crude oil.

5 0
3 years ago
Help me asap!!<br><br> What caused the downfall of the Mongol Empire?
Alex Ar [27]
<span>The decline and end, which gave rise to the Ming Dynasty, of the Mongol Empire was mostly due to internal factors. However, the internal factors were exasperated by frequent Chinese revolts, mostly in southern China. In addition, the Mongol army was not what it had been under Kublai Khan, the quality and quantity of which contributed to the fall of the Mongol Empire.</span>
8 0
4 years ago
Why did nationalism backfire for Bismarck?
olya-2409 [2.1K]

Answer:

B Hope this helps

Explanation:

3 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Interstate Commerce Act of 1887 authorized the federal government to regulate the railroad industry. Which group of people w
    9·2 answers
  • What was the first country to colonize Vietnam?
    11·1 answer
  • What dynasty ruled the Korean Peninsula from AD 668 to AD 935
    6·1 answer
  • Common law as described by the Seventh Amendment makes sure that
    6·2 answers
  • 7. In what area were the Incas mainly located?
    9·2 answers
  • 1679 New Hampshire was established as a colony
    10·1 answer
  • How old is the federal government<br><br>​
    7·2 answers
  • PLZ HURRY WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
    7·1 answer
  • How did George Washington Defeat the british​
    13·2 answers
  • The German plan of unrestricted submarine attacks were primarily focused on European shipping targets. Why did these plans have
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!