This would be the best option because sentence 2 introduces the tea and the earl. Sentence 1 refers to the earl when it says, "how the earl". Since the specific earl is not named in this sentence, we know that the earl should be named earlier in the passage. Also, sentence number 1 introduces the idea of various legends. Sentence 3 introduces ones of those legends; therefore, sentence 1 would need to be before sentence 3 as well.
Porter's statement doesn't create any type of warranty because his opinion is considered as puffery. Puffery is defined in the book as an expression of opinion by a lessor that isn't made as a
<span>representation of fact.</span>