The ACTUAL correct answer is: A. Gulf of Tonkin Resolution
Dates of the items listed:
- Gulf of Tonkin Resolution: 1964
- Operation Rolling Thunder: 1965-1968
- Tet Offensive: 1968
- Vietnamization: began 1969, under Nixon Administration
Further detail on Gulf of Tonkin Resolution:
The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, passed by Congress in August, 1964, after alleged attacks on two US naval ships in the Gulf of Tonkin. The key wording in the resolution said:
- <em>Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, that the Congress approves and supports the determination of the President, as Commander in Chief, to take all necessary measures to repel any armed attack against the forces of the United States and to prevent further aggression.</em>
That resolution served as a blank check for President Johnson to send troops to whatever extent he deemed necessary in pursuance of the war. Between 1964 and the end of Johnson's presidency in 1969, US troop levels in Vietnam increased from around 20,000 to over 500,000.
Political Science | it’s a common term and I believe it’s the only term but someone more knowledgeable can correct me if I’m wrong
Answer:
is a grate question thah you did/
Explanation:
Answer:
4. The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority.
Explanation:
Number 4 is the best option that argues in favor of judicial review as it holds that the judicial's power should extend to ALL cases, in law and equity, under the Constitution, laws or treaties of the nation. Many interpret it to mean that the Judicial, then, has the power to review the actions of the Legislative and the Executive in case they do not comply with the law.
For example, if the legislative branch enacts a law that is not consistent with the Constitution (like a law that establishes a religion) the Supreme Court has the power to review it and declare it unconstitutional as it goes against the first amendment; and if the President were to start collecting taxes (which it is not one of their functions), the Supreme Court would also have the power to declare such act unconstitutional.
Question: <em>Why can social media often be described as an echo chamber?</em>
I think that your answer is,
When people are on their cell devices and using the internet, they tend to block out things around them such as, someone telling them that on Tuesday someone will be calling them or, they have an important event coming up, and the person being told that is or was on their cell device at the time forgets what they were told. An echo chamber is when <em>someone isn't paying attention to the real world and is caught up in social media.</em>