1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Usimov [2.4K]
3 years ago
12

After the french and indian war how did enland try to pay for the cost of the war

History
2 answers:
ra1l [238]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

They taxed the colonists, hope this helps.

Explanation:

Ipatiy [6.2K]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: They added all these taxes that had seemed unfair to the colonist

Explanation:

You might be interested in
in which year was elie weisel deported? a. 1928 b. 1944 c. 1956 d. 1962 please select the best answer from the choices provided
fredd [130]
1944 is the answer C
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement about members of different Christian denominations is most accurate? A. They agree on following Jesus' teachings
slega [8]

Answer:

I believe D is your answer

8 0
3 years ago
Which was a result of the Emancipation Proclamation?
professor190 [17]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Because in my class we learned about this and B sounds about right. if B is that the correct answer please tell me wich one is. but i am 90% sure its right

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLZZZ HELP MEEE LOLOLOL
yawa3891 [41]

<span><span>IT IS an awful lot of rubbish. Since 1960 the amount of municipal waste being collected in America has nearly tripled, reaching 245m tonnes in 2005. According to European Union statistics, the amount of municipal waste produced in western Europe increased by 23% between 1995 and 2003, to reach 577kg per person. (So much for the plan to reduce waste per person to 300kg by 2000.) As the volume of waste has increased, so have recycling efforts. In 1980 America recycled only 9.6% of its municipal rubbish; today the rate stands at 32%. A similar trend can be seen in Europe, where some countries, such as Austria and the Netherlands, now recycle 60% or more of their municipal waste. Britain's recycling rate, at 27%, is low, but it is improving fast, having nearly doubled in the past three years.Even so, when a city introduces a kerbside recycling programme, the sight of all those recycling lorries trundling around can raise doubts about whether the collection and transportation of waste materials requires more energy than it saves. We are constantly being asked: Is recycling worth doing on environmental grounds? says Julian Parfitt, principal analyst at Waste & Resources Action Programme (WRAP), a non-profit British company that encourages recycling and develops markets for recycled materials.Studies that look at the entire life cycle of a particular material can shed light on this question in a particular case, but WRAP decided to take a broader look. It asked the Technical University of Denmark and the Danish Topic Centre on Waste to conduct a review of 55 life-cycle analyses, all of which were selected because of their rigorous methodology. The researchers then looked at more than 200 scenarios, comparing the impact of recycling with that of burying or burning particular types of waste material. They found that in 83% of all scenarios that included recycling, it was indeed better for the environment.Based on this study, WRAP calculated that Britain's recycling efforts reduce its carbon-dioxide emissions by 10m-15m tonnes per year. That is equivalent to a 10% reduction in Britain's annual carbon-dioxide emissions from transport, or roughly equivalent to taking 3.5m cars off the roads. Similarly, America's Environmental Protection Agency estimates that recycling reduced the country's carbon emissions by 49m tonnes in 2005.Recycling has many other benefits, too. It conserves natural resources. It also reduces the amount of waste that is buried or burnt, hardly ideal ways to get rid of the stuff. (Landfills take up valuable space and emit methane, a potent greenhouse gas; and although incinerators are not as polluting as they once were, they still produce noxious emissions, so people dislike having them around.) But perhaps the most valuable benefit of recycling is the saving in energy and the reduction in greenhouse gases and pollution that result when scrap materials are substituted for virgin feedstock. If you can use recycled materials, you don't have to mine ores, cut trees and drill for oil as much,says Jeffrey Morris of Sound Resource Management, a consulting firm based in Olympia, Washington.Extracting metals from ore, in particular, is extremely energy-intensive. Recycling aluminium, for example, can reduce energy consumption by as much as 95%. Savings for other materials are lower but still substantial: about 70% for plastics, 60% for steel, 40% for paper and 30% for glass. Recycling also reduces emissions of pollutants that can cause smog, acid rain and the contamination of waterways.</span></span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which phrase best completes the diagram?
skad [1K]

A)Developed new medical practices

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following best paraphrases this statement? Read the excerpt and answer the question
    13·2 answers
  • NEED HELP ASAP Why couldn’t the thirteen states see eye to eye?
    5·1 answer
  • Which postwar group was targeted by advertisers of products like Rock and roll records and blue jeans?
    8·2 answers
  • How did the French revolution create problems for the United states?
    10·2 answers
  • Please help asap:c i will mark you brainliest
    6·1 answer
  • The Cuban missile crisis (1962) influenced President
    14·1 answer
  • To force Indians to leave their native lands, white men used
    11·1 answer
  • PLEASEE HELP IM FAILING
    10·1 answer
  • What did the soviet union and its allies want during the vietnam war?.
    5·1 answer
  • Many American POWs were
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!