Answer:
c. relative size
Explanation:
Jason has to look down the beach meaning the sand there is furtner from him. Since objects look smaller the further they are, the size he sees it is relative to the distance he sees it from.
Thus the answer is relative size.
Answer:
Southern unionist
Explanation:
A Southern Unionist was a white Southerner who either opposed secession and the Confederate States of America and/or supported the Union or stayed neutral.
Answer:
His ears popping
Explanation:
Conditioned response: In psychology, the term "conditioned response" is described as one of the different parts in the "classical conditioning theory" and is also written as "CR". The theory of classical conditioning was determined by a psychologist named Ivan Pavlov while he was conducting a small experiment in his laboratory on dogs.
A conditioned response is referred to as an organism's behavior that doesn't come out naturally yet it can be leaned by the organisms via the pairing of a "neutral stimulus" with a "potent stimulus" or "unconditioned stimulus".
In the question above, the given statement signifies conditioned response as "his ear-popping".
Mary Rowlandson, a seventeenth century Massachusetts settler, wound up noticeably entrapped in King Philip's War, which was a war between Native Americans and British pilgrims. She, alongside her kids, was caught by Native Americans and held a detainee for recover. Gratefully, her life was safeguarded; in any case, a significant number of her relatives and companions were murdered. She recorded the trial in what is viewed as one of the principal incredible "imprisonment stories."
Answer:
Following are the solution to the given question:
Explanation:
In a mistaken declaration by a child of his age and depending on such misrepresentation, another party engages with a child in good faith. There is no unitary norm. States vary, but any of the above may be valid, based on the jurisdiction.
But you're not bound by the contract whether you have accepted and are under 18 (In the U.S.). If they are brought to court, they will win because a minor cannot agree under 18. Even when a minor is about maturity in the contract, a contract is void.
