1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
SIZIF [17.4K]
3 years ago
9

Why was it necessary for Rome to fight in the Punic Wars?​

History
1 answer:
leva [86]3 years ago
7 0

Rome had a superior army and naval fleet which made them be triumphant in all three Punic wars.

Explanation:

Rome and Carthage fought in three Punic wars wherein Rome faced the victory and Carthage assumed to be the powerful state in North Africa. Rome intervened in the affairs of Sicily which was controlled by Carthage; Rome indulged in a war with Carthage and controlled the city in silkily. It was a very powerful in having a well versed military power and a strong naval fleet.

In the second and third Punic wars, Romans invaded the Carthagean army under the ruler Scipio which made them to have control over Africa as yet another mighty province of Rome.

You might be interested in
To take the lead in the Industrial Revolution, England had enough:
Alex_Xolod [135]
I think the answer is b but please let me know if it was right
6 0
3 years ago
Since the creation of isreal in 1948
Alex_Xolod [135]

Answer:

??

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
EMERGENCY! explain why the sinking of Lusitania and the Zimmerman letter were major contribution for us getting into war
Vesna [10]

Answer

i will help you

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
How does the role of the Russian nobility in government during the 18th century compare to that of the French nobility in the 17
Mekhanik [1.2K]
The best option from the list would be that "<span>In both France and Russia, nobles dominated the government, weakening the power of the monarchy," although this was more so the case in France. </span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was the election of John Quincy Adams in 1824 controversial ?
Len [333]
Many people know this as the "corrupt bargain". Essentially the election was between three candidates: John Quincy Adams, Andrew Jackson, and Henry Clay (who was Speaker of the House at the time). Although Andrew Jackson won the popular vote, none of the candidates met the constitutional requirement for victory. So the House of Representatives had to decide who was president. For some reason Henry Clay was automatically eliminated leaving only John Quincy Adams and Andrew Jackson as candidates. Henry Clay had previous discussions with John Quincy Adams. It is unknown if they struck a deal. But Henry Clay said he supported John Quincy Adams. And since he had a lot of influence in the House John Quincy Adams won. Also Henry Clay became Secretary of State. Furious Andrew Jackson called it the "corrupt bargain". 
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Hryjbddn I kaeb nice month
    8·2 answers
  • Farmers wanted more money in circulation in the late 1800s
    7·1 answer
  • What type of strategy was used in the invasion of Normandy on d-day ?
    13·2 answers
  • 2. What were the effects of the printing press on music and composers?
    9·1 answer
  • How might the influence of the Protestant Reformation and the Scientific Revolution have contributed to the start of the Enlight
    10·1 answer
  • Which statement explains why most emigrants from England came to America in the 1600s?
    14·2 answers
  • Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu.
    7·1 answer
  • What items did traders sell to America Indians in exchange for furs
    10·2 answers
  • Explain one way Pearl Harbor affected the United States.
    15·2 answers
  • What does Washington warn will happen if whites don't work with African Americans for the bettering of the South?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!