The main difference is that the article suggests the murder was likely committed by robbers, while the excerpt suggests a wider range of suspects.
<h3>How can this difference be noticed?</h3>
- Through the reading of texts.
- By identifying the characterization of the killer.
- By comparing the diction between the texts.
- Through the purpose of each text.
With the reading of both texts, it is possible to see that the article tends to present the murder in a more objective and specific way, while the excerpt wants to show that the murder was more complex and with layers of difficult determination.
More information about diction at the link:
brainly.com/question/14571737
D, the first one should be who instead of that, the second one should be that instead of which, the third one should be that instead of which
Answer:
upon the crest
fury of haste
poised for a moment
Explanation:
Hope i am marked as the brainliest answer
I believe it is C. Try and think about where you would naturally pause, you wouldn't say "Tourists in Mexico *pause* enjoy eating the rich, delicious food."
