Answer:
1. <em>If this law of contributory negligence applies to the state, then Ramona will receive no compensation for the damages she sustained. </em>
<em>
</em>2<em>. If this law of comparative negligence applies to this state, then Ramona will get 100% - 20% = 80% of the damages incurred in the accident, from John which will be $80,000</em>
<em />
Explanation:
In contributory negligence, the defense completely bars plaintiffs from any recovery if they contribute to their own injury through their own negligence.
<em>If this law of contributory negligence applies to the state, then Ramona will receive no compensation for the damages she sustained. </em>
<em>
</em>
In comparative negligence, the plaintiff's damages is award by the percentage of fault that the fact-finder assigns to the plaintiff for his or her own injury i.e the plaintiff's damage compensation is reduced by percentage of his/her percentage of fault.
<em>If this law of comparative negligence applies to this state, then Ramona will get 100% - 20% = 80% of the damages incurred in the accident, from John</em>
this is 80% of $100,00 which is equal to <em>$80,000</em>
Answer:
Neighbourhood centre
Explanation:
A neighbourhood centre is a place where local local residents have access to a wide range of services. People gather for group activities, social support, public information and so on.
Phil stopped at a shopping center. He parked in front of the dry cleaner, where he could pick up his suit. He did not have to move his car because next door was a gift shop where he could pick up a gift for his niece. Conveniently enough, next door to that store was a supermarket, where he purchased essentials like milk and cornflake cereal.
Phil is at a neighbourhood centre where wide variety of services are provided locally.
Answer:
Their combined future value will be 8,141.59.
Explanation:
Each deposit is invested at 12%, but for a different amount of years. So, the best thing would be to separate the three, calculate their value at the end of the third year for separated, and then obtain the grand total by adding up the results.
- First deposit = 1,200. It is invested for three years. The value at the end of year 3 is 1,200*(1.12)^3 = 1,685.91
- Second deposit = 2,200. It is invested for two years. The value at the end of year 3 is 2,200*(1.12)^2 = 2,759.68
- Third deposit = 3,300. It is invested for one years. The value at the end of year 3 is 3,300*(1.12) = 3,696.00
- The sum of the three deposits is 8,141.59.
Answer:
Explanation:
1. Less capital: itinerant retailers have to move from one place to another , so they don't have to invest huge capital. For example: hawkers and paddlers have to buy just a hawker and some amount of goods which they can carry.
2. Services to doorsteps: these retailers provides their goods and services at the doors of the customers. For example: a vegetable seller sells vegetables at the doors of the customers
.
3. Elasticity: the goods they sells are usually perishable in nature and whose substitutes are available in abundance. Therefore, these goods are highly elastic
.
4. Economy: the goods which itinerants sells are economically cheaper, which even a low class of society can buy. For example: non-branded goods.
