1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gemiola [76]
4 years ago
8

Do the dates on this map suggest an invasion of people or a migration of people?

History
1 answer:
Fittoniya [83]4 years ago
5 0
I need the picture of the map to answer your question.
You might be interested in
Why did the Roman authorities believe that Christianity was dangerous?
Zigmanuir [339]

Answer:

Romans were afraid that Christians would rebel against the government.

Explanation:

The Roman religion was polytheistic, and the Romans were tolerant of other religions as long as they did not upset the social order. Christianity religion was monotheistic, and they refused to worship other gods. Christianity spread throughout the Roman Empire by apostles and missionaries. Romans was Christian as a threat, and they persecuted many people to avoid rebel against the government.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Witch is president worked with civil right leaders to secure and liberty
aev [14]

Lyndon B. Johnson is the answer

7 0
3 years ago
What would most likely be protected speech or protected action talking loudly on a cell phone during a movie , walking against l
dem82 [27]

Answer

Hi,

Talking loudly on a cell phone during a movie would most likely be protected speech.

Explanation

In the United States, the first amendment protects freedom of speech. Freedom of speech may include the right not to speak, the use of certain offensive words or phrases to pass political message, to participate in symbolic speech, to contribute funds to a political campaigns or to advertise commercial goods and professional services within some rules. A person has the right to talk in low tone or loudly on a cell phone.

All the Best!

6 0
3 years ago
What was the plan for making sure that Germany would never again wage war?
saw5 [17]
D.) Divide Germany into zones that would be occupied by the winning countries until Germany proved it was ready to govern itself.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Discuss the Hundred Years’ War: What were its causes? Why did the war continue for such a long period? What advantages did each
Dahasolnce [82]

Answer and explanation :

The Hundred Years' War was battled among France and England during the late Middle Ages. It kept going 116 years from 1337 to 1453. The war began in light of the fact that Charles IV of France kicked the bucket in 1328 without a child. Edward III of England at that point accepted he reserved the option to turn into the new lord of France through his mom.  

Its fundamental reason was a dynastic squabble that begun when the triumph of England by William of Normandy made a state lying on the two sides of the English Channel. In the fourteenth penny. the English rulers held the duchy of Guinness in France; they disdained paying reverence to the French rulers, and they dreaded the expanding control applied by the French crown over its incredible primitive vassals.  

The speedy explanations behind the Hundred Years War were the mistake of Edward III of England with the disappointment by Philip VI of France of his vows to restore a bit of Guinness taken by Charles IV; the English undertakings to control Flanders, a critical market for English downy and a wellspring of texture; and Philip's assistance of Scotland against England.

None of the members fell like surrendering while they were winning, or until they ended up depleted from the battling, their treasuries were vacant, and they needed to confront political restriction at home.  

There were two noteworthy minutes when the war could have been viewed as done and done, at any rate superficially.  

One such happened in 1360 with the Treaty of Bretigny, where the fundamental dispute point - the status of the Duchy of Aquitaine - was settled in English support. The developed duchy were to stay in Plantagenet hands, who were freed from any need to make a solemn vow to the Valois Kings of France. Consequently, Edward III surrendered his case on the French crown.  

In any case, various focuses consented to were disregarded or exceptionally delayed in being executed as a general rule. Very little has changed in France basically, with groups of meandering criminals flying English hues ravaging the wide open, nobles remaining faithful to 'an inappropriate' party, overseers infringing where they shouldn't, and payments staying unpaid.  

At last Charles V of France figured out how to settle the circumstance to such degree that he could recharge the war in 1369 at the affectation of dishonesty from the English, and win back a large portion of what his precursors have lost. The war trudged on.  

Second such occasion occurred in 1420, with the Treaty of Troyes. This bargain could be viewed as a reasonable triumph for the English. If it somehow happened to turn out to be in excess of a dead letter, that is. Henry V of England were to wed Charles' girl Catherine, become the official of France, and, after Charles' demise, the King of France.  

With the goal for this to occur, the dauphin Charles must be proclaimed ill-conceived, a massively shameful thing for an illustrious line the dauphin could never acknowledge.  

At the point when Catherine brought forth a child (additionally named Henry) the fate of the individual relationship among England and France appeared to be fixed. Notwithstanding, Henry V kicked the bucket of loose bowels just couple of weeks before Charles VI saw his last, and a regime must be set up for the minor Henry VI.  

An illustrious minority can be viewed as a comparable issue to regal dementia, with a ton of intensity winding up misled by those nearest to the ruler. The dauphin kept on taking up arms against his foes, and the war didn't end until thirty-three years have gone since the marking of the Treaty of Troyes.  

The Hundred Years War incurred untold hopelessness on France. Farmlands were ruined, the populace was destroyed by war, starvation, and the Black Death, and pirates threatened the field. Common wars and nearby wars expanded the obliteration and the social deterioration. However the successor of Charles VII, Louis XI, profited by these shades of malice.  

The virtual annihilation of the primitive honorability empowered him to join France all the more unequivocally under the imperial power and to advance and align with the working class. From the remnants of the war an altogether new France developed. For England, the aftereffects of the war were similarly definitive; it stopped to be a mainland power and progressively looked for development as a maritime power.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the american allies help them win so many battles??
    8·2 answers
  • Which statement might have been made by an anti-federalist?
    14·1 answer
  • A myth that explains the spots on the moon is called a(n) ___________.
    6·2 answers
  • How can similarities of language prove the bantu migration
    8·1 answer
  • 12. In what ways were federal troops more technically superior to Native Americans?
    7·1 answer
  • Describe three reasons why the french had better relations with Native Americans than other Europeans had.
    14·2 answers
  • George W. Bush first held political office as .
    13·1 answer
  • The British colonized Australia and made a penal colony for prisoners. Why did the British use Australia as a place to send pris
    15·1 answer
  • Why might a citizen join a political party
    5·1 answer
  • What shifted the war around 1942?
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!