Answer:
There is no “hate speech” exception to the First Amendment. Contrary to a common misconception, most expression one might identify as “hate speech” is protected by the First Amendment and cannot lawfully be censored, punished, or unduly burdened by the government — including public colleges and universities.
Answer<em>:</em><em> </em><em> </em>
<em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em> </em><em>➢</em>
- <em>Plants support rainfall.</em>
- <em>Plants help in soil erosion.</em>
- <em>Plants protect us from air pollution.</em>
- <em>Plants give us rubber, gum, paper, etc.</em>
- <em>Plants are a great source of wood and timber.</em>
- <em>Plants provide us with oil, spices, perfumes, etc.</em>
- <em>Plants give us oxygen, the air which we all breath.</em>
Explanation:
<em>I hope</em><em> it</em><em> will</em><em> help</em><em> you</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>#</em><em>c</em><em>a</em><em>r</em><em>r</em><em>y</em><em>o</em><em>n</em><em>l</em><em>e</em><em>r</em><em>a</em><em>n</em><em>i</em><em>n</em><em>g</em>
Answer:
The answer is Character vs. Society or it might be character vs character. I am pretty sure it is character vs society though.
Explanation:
In this story excerpt they are told to go into hiding and are told that they can no longer do certain things. That is because of the state of the world that the text was in. It is not character vs. character because two characters are not arguing or having any conflict and it is not character vs self because the character is not having an internal conflict about their confidence or mental health or whatever.
Answer:
The allusion is the Titanic and it is a historical allusion
Explanation: