1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Natalija [7]
3 years ago
15

Describe the legal action against McSween and the violence that followed. Answer quick

History
2 answers:
viva [34]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The legal action against McSween and the violence that followed was a result of the takeover of the Tunstall-McSweeny store and the killing of John Tunstall.

Explanation:

The legal action against McSween and the violence that followed was a result of the takeover of the Tunstall-McSweeny store and the killing of John Tunstall. During this time, Tunstall and McSween establish their companies in Lincoln county down the street to challenge the Dolan establishment which was dominating the area.

However, the Dolan store also known as House felt their establishment was illegal and againt thier business and he challenge them in court in a civil case. Dolan investment won the judgment to take over Tunstall-McSweeny stall which he did with the help sheriff posse and the court's writ to confiscate their properties. Tunstall was shot by the sheriff during a protest against the takeover of his ranch. In retaliation on Tunstall's death, Billy and Mcsweeny shot and killed the sheriff Brady and two of his deputies in an ambushed on Lincoln street.

Moreover, this fight continues which also lead to the death of Mcsweeny in 1878

sveta [45]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: Conflict over market control.

Explanation:

The conflict lasted from 1878 to 1881. The reason is control and dominance by trade. The older economic faction was led by James Dolan, while on the side of competitors was Englishman John Tunstall and his associate Alexander McSween. They started a business that was in direct competition with Dolan. Initially, both factions brought together a large number of economic experts and lawyers. In all ways, legal action sought to challenge counterparty trading. When these actions failed, a bloody showdown ensued. Both sides brought together several people who were prone to crime. The conflict led to extermination, and many people lost their lives in it.

You might be interested in
Which effect did hosting the World's Fair in 1984 have on New Orleans?
amid [387]

Answer:

The Superdome has become a symbol of the city's recovery since the massive hurricane that destroyed much of the city. It reopened in time for the Saints' Super Bowl-winning season, and the refurbishing has come as the city continues to rebuild.Aug 10, 2011

I think B Or A

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
What was the government unable to do under the Articles of Confederation
blagie [28]

Under the Articles of Confederation, Congress lacked the authority to regulate commerce, making it unable to protect or standardize trade between foreign nations and the various states.

8 0
2 years ago
The two areas that wanted to trade in ghana were..................
kondaur [170]
The two areas that wanted to trade in Ghana were North Africa and West Africa.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why were many american indians more inclined to side with the french during the seven years' war than they were with the british
3241004551 [841]

Many American Indians more inclined to side with the French during the seven years' war than they were with the British colonists because the French were more inclined to settle widely on native lands than the English or Spanish were.

The Seven Years' War was an international battle between France and Great Britain over dominance on the world stage. Prussia tried to expand its territory in Europe and consolidate its authority as Britain, France, and Spain engaged in combat both in Europe and abroad with land-based troops and naval forces.

French-allied tribes aimed to thwart British advance. The British, who were settling with their wives and families while French trappers were marrying Native women, had caused more trouble than the French, who had caused less.

The French posed less of a danger to the Native Americans than they did in general. Less French were establishing permanent colonies and annexing Native American territory in North America. The Native Americans were likewise given more respect by the French.

Compared to other European nations, the French enjoy a greater rapport with American Indians. There are various reasons for this, including the fact that they respect the locals and depend on their assistance to exist. The yearly trade was their major priority. They earned respect from the Indians since they didn't fight over their territory.

To learn more about seven years' war, refer

brainly.com/question/904638

#SPJ4

8 0
1 year ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the purpose of the great wall
Lynna [10]

Answer:

to protect their territory.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Who holds state power in an oligarchy?
    7·1 answer
  • In what decade did the following international event occur? Radicals attacked the U.S. Embassy in Tehran, Iran's capital, and to
    12·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements bout enzymes is NOT true?
    5·1 answer
  • What are two names of the concentration camps use in the holocaust?
    10·2 answers
  • In which two ways would control over Italy help the Allied forces?
    12·2 answers
  • How did the hyperinflation crisis affect everyday citizens?
    11·1 answer
  • When and where was Adolf Hitler born? *
    5·1 answer
  • What factors led to US entry into the War of 1812?
    13·1 answer
  • Consider the poen's, short stories, and autobiographical pieces you read from the first half of the twentieth
    14·1 answer
  • No question just giving away points...................
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!