1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Natalija [7]
3 years ago
15

Describe the legal action against McSween and the violence that followed. Answer quick

History
2 answers:
viva [34]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The legal action against McSween and the violence that followed was a result of the takeover of the Tunstall-McSweeny store and the killing of John Tunstall.

Explanation:

The legal action against McSween and the violence that followed was a result of the takeover of the Tunstall-McSweeny store and the killing of John Tunstall. During this time, Tunstall and McSween establish their companies in Lincoln county down the street to challenge the Dolan establishment which was dominating the area.

However, the Dolan store also known as House felt their establishment was illegal and againt thier business and he challenge them in court in a civil case. Dolan investment won the judgment to take over Tunstall-McSweeny stall which he did with the help sheriff posse and the court's writ to confiscate their properties. Tunstall was shot by the sheriff during a protest against the takeover of his ranch. In retaliation on Tunstall's death, Billy and Mcsweeny shot and killed the sheriff Brady and two of his deputies in an ambushed on Lincoln street.

Moreover, this fight continues which also lead to the death of Mcsweeny in 1878

sveta [45]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: Conflict over market control.

Explanation:

The conflict lasted from 1878 to 1881. The reason is control and dominance by trade. The older economic faction was led by James Dolan, while on the side of competitors was Englishman John Tunstall and his associate Alexander McSween. They started a business that was in direct competition with Dolan. Initially, both factions brought together a large number of economic experts and lawyers. In all ways, legal action sought to challenge counterparty trading. When these actions failed, a bloody showdown ensued. Both sides brought together several people who were prone to crime. The conflict led to extermination, and many people lost their lives in it.

You might be interested in
Could slaves become citizens in Athens and Rome?
evablogger [386]

Answer:

Yes they could have became citizens of Rome and Athens because the law changed sooner than later.

Explanation:

That law was relaxed as well as time went on; for example, children of freed slaves could apply to become citizens. Even if both parents were Roman citizens, children had no rights. Boys of Roman citizens went though a ceremony when they were 16 or 17, depending upon how close their birthday was to March 17th, and at that time became citizens of Rome with full benefits.

6 0
3 years ago
The "other half" that Jacob Riis referred to in his 1890 book, How the Other Half lives were to
elena55 [62]
The answer is C. Working poor
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Did the north have less manpower than the south
lys-0071 [83]

Answer: The North had way more manpower.

Explanation: The north was always populated to begin with since the living standards were a lot higher than in the south. And when the northern states "forbided" slavery a mass migration of African Americans from southern states moved to the northern states. They migrated to find a better life up in the north(before the civil war). When president lincoln gave the to go sign that African Americans were able to enlist in the army during the American civil war it gave the North a manpower increase, one that the south didn't have since the south did not allow African Americans to be enlisted in thir arms.

6 0
2 years ago
In the nineteenth century, imperial powers such as wanted to increase the number of colonies they controlled. They wanted to gai
Westkost [7]
France and Natural Resources. 
Good luck Comrade.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following was NOT one of the causes of World War 1? A. a buildup of military power in European nations B. the desir
solmaris [256]

This is correct 100%

B. the desire of European nations to remain isolated, not forging relationships with neighbors

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What was the conflict between the French, British and Indians?
    7·1 answer
  • What is the name for the powers the constitution gives to the state governments and forbids the national government from using?
    13·2 answers
  • How did political and economic issues play a role in the Protestant reformation in Europe
    7·1 answer
  • Why did Andrew Jackson not pursue the annexation of Texas?
    10·2 answers
  • Indonesia is northwest of which continent
    5·2 answers
  • IF<br>7. What value of x satisfies the<br>equation 3x + 2 = 14 *​
    5·1 answer
  • Help plz ^-^ Will give brainliest!!!
    9·1 answer
  • Whose capital city of Tenochtitlán had a population larger than most European cities Whose capital city of Tenochtitlán had a po
    13·1 answer
  • Which option is a technique used to represent ideas qualities?
    5·1 answer
  • How did Genghis Khan grow his army? What was the result of that?​
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!