<span>Risk of exposing confidential data:
</span>
<span>Synchronizing the deliverables
</span>
Hidden costs,<span> Lack of customer focus</span>
The answer is true.
If the water wasn't clean most would be sick.
First, there were two independent clinical psychologists who were present or on call 24 hours a day. They had the power to intervene and to remove anyone from the study if they thought they were in distress.
Second, we had paramedics and security guards on hand and ready to intervene at a moment’s notice if anything untoward happened in the study.
Third, the study was constantly monitored by members of a five-person independent ethics panel. This was chaired by a Member of Parliament and also included members of the Holocaust Educational Trust, the Howard League for Penal Reform, the BBC’s Independent Editorial Policy Unit and a senior academic psychologist. This committee had the power to change the way the study as a whole was run and to terminate it if they had ethical concerns.
http://www.bbcprisonstudy.org/bbc-prison-study.php?p=27
What did the sink say to the toilet??
Wow, you look really flushed!!
(sorry it’s not that good)
