Answer:
In general, the constitutional rights of the citizens of the United States should not be conditioned by any type of illegitimate regulation that places a limit on the liberty of the people.
However, the rights are relative, not absolute. This means that although everyone has rights, these rights can be regulated so that people's actions do not harm other individuals or society in general. A clear example is found in the Second Amendment, which guarantees access to weapons for every citizen of the United States. However, a person cannot acquire certain types of weapons that may pose a danger to society, but only those that can guarantee the defense of the individual and his family group.
The same is the case with other rights: rights must always be exercised in such a way that they do not limit the rights of other people.
Must have a basic knowledge of the United States history and government
No, it is not. But its not to common. Indian corn is a starch which is edible but probably tastes bland. Corn that people normally eat is juicy and sweet while if you were to have it before it matures from the internal breakdowns(while its green), it would be hard, crunchy, and bland. Likewise, Indian corn is hard and bland but its not commonly eaten. If you were to use it, it might be best to ground it into a form of corn starch and mix it with something else.
Answer:
if ur talking about indian from asia then u are asian :)
Explanation:
