All categories

3 years ago

-5/3-9/2x=3/2 Simplify as much as possible

Mathematics

1 answer:

Murljashka [212]3 years ago

8 0

-5/3-9/2x=3/2
-10/6-9/2x=9/6
-9/2x=19/6
x=19/6÷-9/2
x=-19/6×2/9
x=-38/54 or -19/27. Hope it help!

You might be interested in

Help with these two

kupik [55]

8) there are 3 people and each pays 14.68
3•14.68= $ 44.04 was the entire meal

10) 15 oz that he drank+ 20oz that were left= 35 oz were originaly in the container

5 0

3 years ago

Robert found jeans on sale for 20%off the jeans were originally 65$ how much did he pay for the jeans

Mademuasel [1]

20% of 65 is $52

Hope this helps

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is the slope of the line that passes through the points R(11, 6) and S(9, -1)?

mr_godi [17]

Answer:

The slope is 7/2

Step-by-step explanation:

The slope of a line can be found by

m = (y2-y1)/(x2-x1)

= (-1 -6)/(9 - 11)

-7 / -2

7/2

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Kaylee has 1 1/2 cups of yogurt to make smoothies. Each smoothie uses 1/2 cup of yogurt. How many smoothies can Kaylee make wi

Orlov [11]

Answer:

3 is the answer .

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Location is known to affect the number, of a particular item, sold by an automobile dealer. Two different locations, A and B, ar

yKpoI14uk [10]

Answer:

We conclude that the true mean number of sales at location A is fewer than the true mean number of sales at location B.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that Location A was observed for 18 days and location B was observed for 13 days.

On average, location A sold 39 of these items with a sample standard deviation of 8 and location B sold 49 of these items with a sample standard deviation of 4.

Let $\mu_1$ = true mean number of sales at location A.

$\mu_2$ = true mean number of sales at location B

So, Null Hypothesis, $H_0$ : $\mu_1-\mu_2\geq0$ or $\mu_1 \geq \mu_2$ {means that the true mean number of sales at location A is greater than or equal to the true mean number of sales at location B}

Alternate Hypothesis, $H_A$ : $\mu_1-\mu_2$ or $\mu_1< \mu_2$ {means that the true mean number of sales at location A is fewer than the true mean number of sales at location B}

The test statistics that would be used here Two-sample t test statistics as we don't know about the population standard deviations;

T.S. = $\frac{(\bar X_1-\bar X_2)-(\mu_1-\mu_2)}{s_p\sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1}+\frac{1}{n_2} } }$ ~ $t_n__1_-_n__2-2$

where, $\bar X_1$ = sample average of items sold at location A = 39

$\bar X_2$ = sample average of items sold at location B = 49

$s_1$ = sample standard deviation of items sold at location A = 8

$s_2$ = sample standard deviation of items sold at location B = 4

$n_1$ = sample of days location A was observed = 18

$n_2$ = sample of days location B was observed = 13

Also, $s_p=\sqrt{\frac{(n_1-1)s_1^{2}+(n_2-1)s_2^{2} }{n_1+n_2-2} }$ = $\sqrt{\frac{(18-1)\times 8^{2}+(13-1)\times 4^{2} }{18+13-2} }$ = 6.64

So, test statistics = $\frac{(39-49)-(0)}{6.64 \times \sqrt{\frac{1}{18}+\frac{1}{13} } }$ ~ $t_2_9$

= -4.14

The value of t test statistics is -4.14.

Now, at 0.01 significance level the t table gives critical value of -2.462 at 29 degree of freedom for left-tailed test.

Since our test statistics is less than the critical values of t as -2.462 > -4.14, so we have sufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will fall in the rejection region due to which we reject our null hypothesis.

Therefore, we conclude that the true mean number of sales at location A is fewer than the true mean number of sales at location B.

3 0

3 years ago