The correct answer would be, Threat and Challenge.
A stressor would be appraised as a Threat if someone anticipates that it could lead to some kind of harm, loss, or other negative consequences; however, if someone believes that it carries the potential for gain or personal growth, it would be appraised as a Challenge.
Explanation:
A Stressor is something that causes pain, stress, strain or tension to someone. There could be a lot of stressors that we experience in our lives. Some of those are:
- Death of a closed or loved one
- Termination of Job
- Divorce or Break up
- Financial set backs, etc.
So if a stressor leads to some kind of harm, loss or other negative consequences in someone's life, it would be considered as a threat. For example if someone has a breakup and he is in deep stress and starts to consume alcohol frequently, then this stressor would be considered a threat.
Similiarly is a stressor lead to some kind of gain or personal growth, it would be appraised as a challenge. For example, if someone's mother dies, and she wanted him to become doctor, then this stressor will act as a challenge for him and he will work hard to fulfill his mother's wish and thus the stressor would be appraised as a challenge.
Learn more about Stressors at:
brainly.com/question/12187417
#LearnWithBrainly
As more developing nations industrialize, it can be expected that more factories and industries will be sprouting out. Global modernization will happen which entails a great responsibility to producers and consumers most especially on its side effects.
Answer:Pleasure Induction tactic of manipulation.
Explanation:
Pleasure induction is manipulation tactic whereby an individual convinces another individual to believing that an action will be fun and interesting to carry out or participate in.
Here Kiara in wanting her son , Samuel help her in the kitchen, tries to do that by by manipulating him to thinking that chopping would be fun which is an act of Pleasure Induction tactic.
Answer:
Arguing from analogy
Explanation:
Argument by analogy is a term used to describe a situation where a non-deductive assessment is made comparing two things that are totally similar, or in some ways, that is, this type of argument allows conclusions to be made by comparing two similar things . these conclusions are capable of helping an individual to make some important decisions.
An example of this can be seen in the question above, where in an argument related to the pricing of goods, Nathan, sales manager at Expa Manufacturing Inc., argues that the company will charge 25% more than the previous price because Leon Manufacturing , Expo Manufacturing's sister company, charges more for its goods. These two companies are similar and a decision is being made about them, based on the comparison between the two.
I do believe the answer to this question is b
