All categories

3 years ago

Why did the colonies fight the British

1 answer:

3 0

one of the reason's why the colonist fought the British is because the colonists weren't being represented in the British parliament (government) and the king was imposing taxes and levies on the colonists. Have you ever heard the phase Taxation without Representation? I believe that was the major reason why they fought the British.

Hopefully this helps.

You might be interested in

An editor can express a bias by choosing to use or not to use a specific news item. What kind of bias is this

s2008m [1.1K]

A type of bias, that editors can commonly undergo while choosing which news item to use, is known as Bias through Selection and Omission.

By deciding whether to use a certain news story or not, an editor might demonstrate prejudice.
To give readers or viewers a new perspective on the events being reported, some details in a tale may be neglected while others may be included.
The selecting procedure involves both media distributors and viewers equally.
Where a person goes to get their media has bias built into it through selection and omission.
This is due to the fact that an individual is unable to consume all available media and points of view.

From the above, it is clear that the correct answer is Bias through Selection and Omission.

Learn more about Bias here:

brainly.com/question/4540984

#SPJ4

6 0

1 year ago

What is the difference between microeconomics and macroeconomics?

rusak2 [61]

Microeconomics can be defined as a branch of economics where the behavior of individuals and small impacting organizations are studied, where each of these decisions are allocated of limited resources. Microeconomics looks at these behaviors and investigates how it affects the supply and demand of the goods and how this affects the pricing. Macroeconomics studies the total economic activity regarding growth, inflation and unemployment and can deal with national economic policies.

8 0

3 years ago

Where can we find the roots of our problematic ideas about "cultural authenticity"?

sasho [114]

A cultural system creates a unique world that is experienced as "reality" by its members. The people of a certain culture come to accept the "realities" which form its culture.

However, when groups of different cultures come together, their "realities" become confronted. Creating a clash of cultures. The outcome of this clash is decided by the material power of each of this groups. The group with the most material will emerge victoriously and end up influencing the other group with its cultural system. Therefore, individuals from the influenced culture will end up learning a new "reality" by force. On the other hand, individuals of the influencing culture tend to see the others as "objects of study".

Clashes of cultures have been occurring throughout time, affecting the cultural authenticity of groups. Due to the constant blend of cultures, it is nowadays, very difficult to consider that a certain cultural group is "truly authentic".

4 0

3 years ago

Give ten answers that could complete the following statement.

Stolb23 [73]

Answer:

The ten answers that could be used with the affirmation are:

1. If relativism were true, then there would be no evil.

2. If relativism were true, then there would be no truth.

3. If relativism were true, then there would be no goodness.

4. If relativism were true, then there would be no genders.

5. If relativism were true, then there would be no lies.

6. If relativism were true, then there would be no exact sciences.

7. If relativism were true, then there would be no punctuality.

8. If relativism were true, then there would be no tolerance.

9. If relativism were true, then there would be no fullness.

10. If relativism were true, then there would be no strength.

Explanation:

The relativism is the conception of all the things that we can have in the world or the life depend of the point of view of the observer, so, basic topics how the truth, kindness, genders and other things that were regularly taken for granted due to the lack of subjectivity in themselves, now need to be taken into account from multiple points of view to get a more complete general idea.

7 0

3 years ago

What is one way in which Caesar Augustus improved Rome's army?

stiks02 [169]

Answer:

hired more generals your welcome

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers