Answer:
Null hypothesis is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
Alternative hypothesis is U1 - U2 > 0
Step-by-step explanation:
The question involves a comparison of the two types of training given to the salespeople. The requirement is to set up the hypothesis that type A training leads to higher mean weakly sales compared to type B training.
Let U1 = mean sales by type A trainees
Let U2 = mean sales by type B trainees
Therefore, the null hypothesis (H0) is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
This implies that type A training does not result in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
The alternative hypothesis (H1) is: U1 - U2 > 0
This implies that type A training indeed results in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
area = 41 units²
Step-by-step explanation:
area = (8 x 4) + (3 x 3) = 41 units²
Answer:
(0,0), (1,1), (2,2)
Step-by-step explanation:
When testing to find possible points in situations like this, I always start by testing with the origin point (0,0).
In this case:
4x+6y<24 ==> 0 + 0 < 24 TRUE, it satisfies the inequality.
We then try with (1,1):
4x+6y<24 ==> 4 + 6 < 24 TRUE, it satisfies the inequality.
And with (2,2):
4x+6y<24 ==> 8 + 12 < 24 TRUE, it satisfies the inequality.
Solve for x by simplifying both sides of the equation, then isolating the variable.
Exact Form would be or look like
x=9/5, -3/5
