Apple Inc. can be regarded as a transnational company because it operates differently in different countries or regions.
A transnational company can be referred to or considered as a company, which has a differentiated modus operandi in different countries. Apple is an example of a transnational company, because it operates differently in America, while it operates as per the rules and regulations of the European Union in the Europe. Additionally, the manufacturing of its hardware is different as per the demands of different countries or regions.
Learn more about a transnational company here:
brainly.com/question/29794202
#SPJ4
Answer:
4.28 grams
Explanation:
The z score is used to determine by how many standard deviations the raw score is above or below the mean. The z score is given by the formula:
Given that:
P(x > 5.1 grams) = 5%, x = 5.1 grams, σ = 0.5 grams
P(x > 5.1 grams) = 5%
P(x < 5.1 grams) = 100% - 5% = 95%
P(x < 5.1) = 95%
From the normal distribution table, 95% corresponds with a z score of 1.645. Hence:
Answer: Company should not expand to either.
Explanation:
Find the expected values of expanding to either country and pick the country with the highest expected value:
China:
= ∑(Probability of outcome * Outcome)
= (20% * 2,000,000) + (30% * 1,000,000) + (50% * -2,000,000)
= -$300,000
Vietnam:
= (70% * 1,000,000) + (30% * -2,500,000)
= -$50,000
<em>Both countries result in an expected loss so company should not expand to either of them. </em>
Answer: internet advertising
Explanation:
Answer:
Option E.
Explanation:
In free trade, a country with a comparative advantage in a good produces that good in the long-term. Therefore, if these people are working in an industry in which it has a higher opportunity cost i.e. it does not have a comparative advantage; they will eventually see job loss or fall in income or both. On other hand, when they purchase goods which has lower opportunity costs in foreign, they get access to these at a lower price and can purchase a higher quantity. So, these people are both harmed and benefitted by free trade.
