Answer:
The correct answers are x + y = 5600 and x - y = 700.
Step-by-step explanation:
Write a system of equations in x and y describing the situation. Do not solve the system.
Keiko has a total of $ 5600, which she has invested in two accounts.
Let x be the amount of money in the larger account and y be the amount of money in the smaller account.
So, Keiko has invested her $5600 in two accounts x and y.
Thus x + y = 5600.
Also, given by the problem, the larger account (x) is $ 700 greater than the smaller account (y).
Thus x - y = 700.
Thus the two system of equation in x and y describing the given situation are
x + y = 5600 and x - y = 700
<h3>
Answer: Choice B</h3>
The set notation includes all values from -5 to 0, but the domain only includes the integer values
eg: something like -1.2 is in the second set, but it is not in the set {-5,-4,-3,-2,-1}
==========================================================
Further explanation:
Let's go through the answer choices one by one
- A. This is false because 0 does not come before -5, but instead -5 is listed first. The order -5,-4,-3,-2,-1,0 is correct meaning that
is the correct order as well. - B. This is true. A value like x = -1.2 is in the set
since -1.2 is between -5 and 0; but -1.2 is not in the set {-5, -4, -3, -2, -1, 0}. So the distinction is that we're either considering integers only or all real numbers in this interval. To ensure that we only look at integers, the student would have to write 
. The portion 
means "x is in the set of integers". The Z refers to the German word Zahlen, which translates to "numbers". - C. This is false. The student used the correct inequality signs to indicate x is -5 or larger and also 0 or smaller; basically x is between -5 and 0 inclusive of both endpoints. The "or equal to" portions indicate we are keeping the endpoints and not excluding them.
- D. This is false. Writing
would not make any sense. This is because that compound inequality breaks down into 
. Try to think of a number that is both smaller than -5 AND also larger than 0. It can't be done. No such number exists.
158, because to solve this question we first need to know the formula for finding the surface area of a rectangular prism which is A=<span>2<span>(<span><span><span>wl</span>+<span>hl</span></span>+<span>hw</span></span><span>) then you just need to input the numbers like so A=2(5*3+8*3+8*5) then when you simplify this down you get A=2(79) then distribute like so so A=158
Enjoy!=)</span></span></span>
We will owes 0 dollars cause 164 multiply by 12 = 1968
