In the story of “Shooting an Elephant”, when the narrator views the body of the Burmese man who had been creased to death in a crucifix-styled posture, he has an overwhelming attack of conscience. The narrator realizes that just like the Burmese man, the elephant had been crucified, as well, and it does not appease the narrator that his killing the elephant was within legal parameters.The narrator apprehends that the law and conscience are often not well-matched. He is there in an official capability and is hated for it by the Burmese. He equally has hated them for their anger. Yet, when he allows his morality to surface, he understands that he is part of the structure that is there to tyrannize the Burmese. The fact that he holds a position of authority does not essentially make it a moral duty. This is true of his killing the elephant. He did not want to lose face in front of the Burmese, and he was legally justified in killing it, but morally he knows that it was actually morally wrong.
Answer:
Analytic Essay: is a brief work of nonfiction in which a writer explores a subject by breaking it into parts. ... I think that "The American Idea" is both an analytic essay and an interpretive essay. This is because in an analytic essay he explores how America developed and how people came to make a better life.
Explanation:
Honestly, you wanna tie the knot as tight as you can so it doesn't come loose, for example with fishing line, you don't want to loose your lure, so tie it tight. The only thing I would disagree with this, is on shoes, I want to be able to get my lases undone.
Answer:
tbh I watched this movie but never knew what happened to the father
Explanation:
he could've left to get milk and never came back
