The argument relies on claims that are not backed up by facts
In the very, very simplest terms, judging the validity of an argument starts centers around this process:
1) Identify the rhetoric (Lines of Argument) from the actual, formal reasons. Separate the persuasive language from the actual claims to truth and fact.
2) Analyze those reasons (claims to truth and fact) by identifying their logic (often in the Implicit Reasons) and evidence.
3) Test and evaluate the logic and evidence; identify logical errors and ask whether the evidence can and has been tested and objectively, repeatedly, factually verified.
The character that proposes the story telling competition that frames the remainder of the Canterbury tales is : Bailey
After creating the competition, Bailey quickly appoint himself as the judge for that competition
hope this helps
You should try to read the book I am not trying to be mean but it is an amazing book that you should take time to study.
I think the answer must be of B no.
