Answer:main points, evidence, technique
Explanation:
The scholarly source for Miguel is D. An academic journal about the marine environment
<h3>What is a Source?</h3>
This refers to the place of information where people go to consult and get information about a variety of things.
Hence, we can see that based on Miguel's research about the effects of pollution on the Pacific Ocean, we can see that the scholarly source is D. An academic journal about the marine environment
Read more about scholarly sources here:
brainly.com/question/18754197
#SPJ4
Answer:
1. He's tall, isn't he?
2. They're not coming soon, are they?
3. She does basketball, doesn't she?
4. We weren't at the party yesterday, we're we?
5. You can drive, can't you?
6. She did a lot of work, didn't she?
7. They must keep the kitchen clean, musn't they? ( This one's kind of hard sorry if it's not correct, but I believe it is)
8. You'll come to my recital, won't you?
9. We won't be excepted to help, will we?
10. They've started on their homework, haven't they?
11. He could just walk to school in the morning, couldn't he?
12. She wouldn't steal anything from the store, would she?
Answer:
The author's purpose for including Ecker's study was to support his claim that headlines matter and change the perspective of readers.
Explanation:
"How Headlines Change The Way We Think" is an article written by Maria Konnikova. The article talks about how headlines change the perspective of readers.
In this article, the author includes Ullrich Ecker's study. As per the study, Ecker suggests that a slight change in the words in headlines does make a difference in the reader's perspective. In his studies, the factual article (which was misleading), hurt the reader's ability to recall detail's from the article.
Therefore, the purpose was to support the author's claim, with facts, that how headlines change the reader's perspective.
