Answer:
false- 44 president Barack Obama was not a white man
Explanation:
Answer:
Exclamation of commitment
Explanation:
Escalation of commitment can be defined as the way in which a person is having challenges concerning a particular thing due to the difficulty or negative result in resolving it and instead of the person to abandon it, the individual did not relent.
Exclamation of commitment often occur in a situation in which an individual like a particular thing, in which such person continue to invest their money or resources on it despite not giving them positive outcome due to the resource they might have spent on it earlier making it difficult for them to have a change of mind concerning it, in which they might later abandoned it because it was unsuccessful.
Therefore This incident illustrates the group dynamic of: EXCLAMATION OF COMMITMENT
Answer:
Explanation:
maximizing = getting the most of everything
satisfying = being contented with whatever you have
The average westerners is quite ambitious; they are taught to acquire as much wealth,skills and properties as possible while one of the main concepts of buddhism is not being attached to materials things. buddhists are taught to be satisfied with whatever they have and to not chase material things, Hence the different types of motivation.
Answer:
C. Good Funds Act
Explanation:
Good Funds Act are simply laws that are made to protect the money funding purchasing of mortgage and refinancing transactions are safe for disbursement at the time of closing.
This act is actually meant to safeguard all parties from discovering they have unfunded mortgage at closing.
Good fund law is also known as Residential closing fund distribution Act of 2005. And it could be found in Good Funds Law (TCA § 47-32-101)
Section: 47-32-105 – Disbursement of funds by settlement agent from escrow or settlement account
Clothilde brought her money to escrow at closing and was desperate for the sale to record immediately so she and her dog could move in..was an example of Good fund Act.
Answer:
Nathan is a public official whose salaried duties include real estate transactions.
Explanation:
In the situation shown in the question above, we can conclude that Nathan is a civil servant whose salaried duties include real estate transactions, for this reason, he is not violating any license law, even though he does not have a real estate license in DC.
A civil servant is a person who provides a service of social utility, that is, who gives support to others without ulterior motives or for their personal benefit (he has nothing to gain but the salary he earns for his work). Public servants, as a general rule, provide services on behalf of the State. It is the responsibility of state institutions (such as hospitals, schools or security forces) to bring public service to the entire community.
