<span>Since the decision of the
Speaker of the House, John William McCormack, was to ask the high
chamber member Adam Clayton Powell Jr. not to take an oath, because of
the previous scandal in which Powell had been involved; If
the jury had decided in favor of Speaker McCormack, the way of operating
in the congress would have been questioned, since only one member could
be expelled according to what the constitution says, and not by the
decisions of the speaker. <span>The scope would have been very
large if it failed in McCormack's favor, giving a sense of illegality or
favoritism, and voters would feel that their representatives were not
respected.</span></span>
Romans were able to battle at Sea which helped them to expand their nation. Not all nations had ships and not all nations could fight on water and land. The romans had that advantage.
Dear Editor,
I want to draw your attention towards the key strengths that the patriots have which may, according to me, lead them to a victory in war of independence.
The first important thing to consider is the war strategy that the patriots and the British have adopted. I understand the patriots have neither a naval power nor a specialized army. However, the strength here is the suffering of the desertion rates by the army which, I think, will pretty much pay them back positively.
Secondly, the deployment of the famous Fabian Strategy by Gen. Washington will yield fruitful results for the patriots. This is because it directly targets the Hudson Highland Strategy of the British without necessarily involving in conventional battle.
Thirdly, I think the alliance with France is of paramount importance here; Morgan successfully managed to lure Cornwallis in after the Battle of Cowpens in the year 1781. Due to all of these key strengths, I believe the patriots will win the war of independence.
Regards,
XYZ.
The goddess Venus favorite flower was the rose
