Answer:
"ELO MESSI"
Step-by-step explanation:
Hope it helps
25% is being taken off the original price, p, of each patio chairs.
That means the price of each patio chair is the full price, p, minus <span>25% of the original price.
1) To find 25% of the original price, multiply p (original price) by the decimal form of 25%, or 0.25. That means 25% off original price = 0.25p.
2) Now subtract 0.25p from the original price of the chairs to find the price of each (1) chair. p - 0.25p
Shylah is buying 4 chairs at that discounted price. That means you need to multiply the discounted price, </span> p - 0.25p, by 4. Shylah is paying 4(p-0.25p) total for the 4 chairs, which is answer choice B.
Since you can choose more than one choice, you can simplify 4(p-0.25p) by subtracting what is in the parathesis, then multiplying, following the order of operations:
4(p-0.25p)
= 4(0.75p)
= 3p
That is answer choice A.
--------
Answer: Choices A and B, <span>3p and 4(p−0.25p).</span>
Answer:
19
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:26 is the answer I think
Step-by-step explanation:
Step-by-step explanation:
x'=53
σ=16
n=144
a) hypothesis
H0:µ=55
Ha:µ<55
This is a left tailed test
b) Test statistics
- z=(x'-u)/(sigma/sqrt {n})
=(53-55)/(16/sqrt{144})
=-1.5
c)Pvalue at z=|-1.5|
pvalue= p(z>1.5)
=1-0.933193
=0.066807
=0.0668
<u>Decision</u>
since pvalue>alpha(0.05) fail to reject the null hypotheis.
<u>Conclusion</u>
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim the new computer program has not reduce the time to retrieve the data.
d)since Pvalue>alpha(0.025),so fail to reject the null hypothesis.
No, change in conclusion.