Answer:
The correct answer is B, <em>they struggled for control of the Middle East</em>.
Explanation:
The history of the relationship between the Ottomans and Safavids is mainly characterized by their conflicts for the control of different regions of the Middle East. All the other options don't correctly describe this history.
However, because both societies were Muslim according to Islam they couldn't war against each other unless it was for religious reasons.
Thus in the early 1500s Selim I, sultan of the Ottoman Empire consulted his scholars and decided that the Shah Ismail of the Safavids preached heresies against Islam. He then persecuted internal supporters of the Safavids which intensified the rivalry between the two empires.
The conflict between Ottomans and Safavids was fought also through trade embargoes in the 1500s. Ottomans imposed trade embargoes against the Safavids but they only worked until the early 1600s. In the 18th century, they would start to see themselves all parts of the same faith but still fearing each other.
Answer:
A:Church Leader
Explanation:
They were all rasict in the south in that time and southern children would have parents who owned slaves wouldn't be able to own there own individual slaves for themselves
Answer:
favoring or enforcing strict obedience to authority, especially that of the government, at the expense of personal freedom.
Explanation:
a governing value that values order and control over personal freedom
Answer:
"Even today, the need for work is a common reason people move to urban areas."
This sentence, although not inaccurate, is not necessary in order for the rest of the paragraph to be coherent. The sentence states that nowadays, people continue to move for work. However, the passage is not a comparison between the past and the present. It simply wants to inform us of the changes that led to bigger cities. Therefore, you can remove this sentence without seriously altering the author's explanation.
Answer:
According to Marx, a major impedament is the discord among the proletariat.
Explanation:
The persons with the most resources have a tendency to be in control, the top 5% verus the other 95%. The proletariat is too divided into many issues, which prevents them from joining forces to overtake the top 5%. Marx theorized that if the proletariat were to join forces collectively, they could affect change in their direction.
