1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kaheart [24]
3 years ago
8

Why do you think the u.s. drove native Americans out of their land?​

History
2 answers:
marshall27 [118]3 years ago
8 0

I think the us just wanted to prove themselves by starting a new civilization. They didn't want to share their new home so the drove the native americans out. if this is good, could u mark brainliest?

ElenaW [278]3 years ago
6 0
Because they wanted the land for themselves and they wanted to change Natives American to act more like them
You might be interested in
Which of the following statements about the Gault case is NOT true? A. It changed the rights of juveniles in American courts. B.
Natali [406]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Al-Aqsa Mosque and Dome of the Rock are located in _____
snow_lady [41]
You answer for the above question is: D- Jerusalem 
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If a historian takes a source out of context, she is likely to:
DIA [1.3K]

Option A. If a historian takes a source out of context, she is likely to:

A. misunderstand the intended meaning of historical actions.

<h3>What does it mean to take things out of context?</h3>

This is used to refer to the fact that a person is taking what is being said outside of the meaning that the message is supposed to convey. It has to do with not being able to understand what is said and interpreting it accordingly.

In this situation, when the historian takes things out of their context, then it means that they would not understand the true meaning of the happenings of that period.

Read more on historical events here: brainly.com/question/17040564

#SPJ1

8 0
1 year ago
25 poi
goldenfox [79]

The correct answer is C. They provided a fresh water supply and rich soil for growing food.

Explanation:

Early human civilizations relied on agriculture and animal domestication because only through these activities humans could settle in one place and create villages, cities, etc. as they obtained food in one place. Additionally, these activities could be better developed near rivers not only because humans could have a constant supply of fresh water for themselves (essential for survival), their crops, and animals, but also because the land near rivers is usually fertile and ideal for agriculture. According to this, the reason why first cultures developed near rivers is due to the water supply and rich soil these provided.

4 0
3 years ago
2. PART A: What does "inviolably" mean as it is
Nastasia [14]
C; when possible hope this helps :)
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did industrialization impact US foreign policy in the late 19th century
    7·1 answer
  • A(n) __________ is a whirling storm that forms over the ocean in tropical regions.
    13·1 answer
  • In his work Summa Theologica, who concluded that there is no conflict between faith and reason?
    11·2 answers
  • The first state to have al African Americans regiment was?
    13·2 answers
  • which of the following is not included in the study of economics?a)Scarce resources.b)Choice.c)What people should buy.d)Opportun
    8·1 answer
  • What was the “Iron curtain” the Winston Churchill referred to?
    15·2 answers
  • Who is considered to be the most influential leader of the early Christian church?
    14·1 answer
  • Why is opposition between parties considered healthy and good for politics?
    6·1 answer
  • 3. Zebulon Pike is linked to the exploration of .
    8·2 answers
  • Why did the French set up trading post in North American
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!