The translator is an author, a writer who does not start writing from scratch, but from a text written in a language that he has to translate into a different language, adapting it at the same time. The translator not only has to transfer the lexical and syntactic aspect, in fact, a set of words, although well constructed at the syntactic level is not enough, it is not very comprehensible and will lack that "something" that every good translator has to give to the text . The fact that a translated text must remain faithful to the meaning of the original text, without compromising the linguistic norms of the target language, is a key principle of translation, more or less shared by everyone. From this principle all the considerations of the translator and the translation techniques that he chooses are based or have to be based. The translator, as far as possible, has to try to overcome the obstacle of double translation and try to make his version as similar as possible to the original. A so-called "bridge language" is sometimes used.
Hello there, to help right of the bat. I know B is not the right answer. But after reading i belive that A is the correct answer choice because Churchhill is basically saying that during WW2, the British and the French saved Belgium, but only after it was attacked. Churchhill is saying that if they would not have been neutral they could have saved Poland from Axis attacks. So i belive that the answer is A
People in the market can take your money. you could be buying something that really isn't worth as much as it costs.
I think it would be 2 because that demonstrates the people likening them a lot. Hope this helps:)
