Answer:
d) Purchasing $18,000 (000) worth of plant and equipment
D. As the cost are forecast they can change over the course of the expansion making possible to be above budget. This may lead to an emergency loan if the cash flow and inflow of the company are don't go as planned which could be the case during a project of this magnitude.
Explanation:
<em>Missing information:</em>
a) A $5 dividend
b) Liquidate the entire inventory
c) Retiring the oldest bond
d) Purchasing $18,000 (000) worth of plant and equipment
------------------
A) dividends would not be the cause as they are determinated by the company they can chose not to declare it.
B) lquidate the inventory means selling and not replenish. This generates cash it doesn't use cash
C) re-rolling the debt (by issuing new bonds) is a course of action planned and that in hte end will not affect the cash of the company as will be paying the bonds and receiving from the new bonds thus the changes in cash would be controlled.
D. As the cost are forecast they can change over the course of the expansion making possible to be above budget. This may lead to an emergency loan if the cash flow and inflow of the company are don't go as planned which could be the case during a project of this magnitude.
Answer:
D, product-communication adaptation
Explanation:
Product adaptation can be defined as the process of modifying a product to make it useful for a variety of users.
Communication adaptation can also be defined as the change in a product's communication as a result of a change in product strategy.
Product-communication adaptation can be defined as the modification of a product for a variety of users but ensuring that the marketing of the product is through standard communication channels.
In the case of Campbell adapted his product to look like M'm M'm Good product but ensured that he used a standard communication channel (ads) to market his product.
Cheers.
Based on the percentage of readers who own a particular make of the car and the random sample, we can infer that there is sufficient evidence at a 0.02 level to support the executive claim.
<h3>What is the evidence to support the executive's claim?</h3>
The hypothesis is:
Null hypothesis : P = 0.55
Alternate hypothesis : P ≠ 0.55
We then need to find the test statistic:
= (Probability found by marketing executive - Probability from publisher) / √( (Probability from publisher x (1 - Probability from publisher))/ number of people sampled
= (0.46 - 0.55) / √(( 0.55 x ( 1 - 0.55)) / 200
= -2.56
Using this z value as the test statistic, perform a two-tailed test to show:
= P( Z < -2.56) + P(Z > 2.56)
= 0.0052 + 0.0052
= 0.0104
The p-value is 0.0104 which is less than the significance level of 0.02. This means that we reject the null hypothesis.
The Marketing executive was correct.
Find out more on the null and alternate hypothesis at brainly.com/question/25263462
#SPJ1
Answer:
How are we suppose to know??????
Explanation:
Is that the question or what i need info.XD
